Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogue emissary

(3,216 posts)
1. From the article
Sat Jun 17, 2017, 05:28 PM
Jun 2017

At least 82 officers across the country have faced murder or manslaughter charges for on-duty shootings since the beginning of 2005, according to research from Philip Stinson, an associate professor of criminology at Ohio’s Bowling Green State University. Just 29 of those cases have ended in conviction, although a number are still pending. No officer has been convicted so far this year.

Juries have shown time and time again that they’re “not willing to second-guess officers who get on the stand and testify at their own trial in their own defense that he or she thought that they were gonna get killed and that’s why they used deadly force,” Stinson said.

Stinson said police kill around 1,000 civilians each year, and that verdicts like the one in Yanez’s case suggest the legal system may be willing to accept that these casualties are “just the cost of doing business.”
---------------------------------------

What I don't understand is why anyone would accept that cost. By letting these officers off they're saying their fine with police getting away with murder.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

From the article rogue emissary Jun 2017 #1
I find it interesting that the 'Peace Officer' sheshe2 Jun 2017 #2
The infuriating part is Yanez's reason for pulling Castile over. rogue emissary Jun 2017 #3
The real infuriating part is the fact that Castile mtngirl47 Jun 2017 #4
Exactly right, mtngirl. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #8
I live a short distance from where it occurred. Scruffy1 Jun 2017 #11
He has been stopped 52 times?????? DK504 Jun 2017 #5
... sheshe2 Jun 2017 #6
It is called profiling. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #7
All of those stops were for MINOR offsenses, such as driving without a muffler still_one Jun 2017 #9
Profiling. Yes. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #10
No question about it, and the stats back that up. This pattern has gone on for far too long still_one Jun 2017 #12
It will never happen with Jeff in charge. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #18
I know. Congress would have to do it anyway, and currently that isn't going to happen still_one Jun 2017 #19
NOT ONE OF THEM GIVES A SHIT! sheshe2 Jun 2017 #20
There are a few in Congress, but for the most part you are correct I am sorry to say still_one Jun 2017 #21
Yes. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #22
yes, SOME Democrats, and NOT ONE republican. still_one Jun 2017 #23
Omfg. Duppers Jun 2017 #13
Yup. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #14
I'm really amazed there's not been more backlash to this verdict. cwydro Jun 2017 #15
I don't have much faith in justice when it is a blackman... sheshe2 Jun 2017 #16
Condolences To His Girlfriend & Family Me. Jun 2017 #17
But Sheshe JustAnotherGen Jun 2017 #24
I know, JAG...I know. sheshe2 Jun 2017 #26
Sickening lillypaddle Jun 2017 #25
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»This says it all...no nee...»Reply #1