Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
True Crime
In reply to the discussion: Newbie here. Came to discuss Jodi Arias trial? No threads? [View all]Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)19. Wow...thanks for all you wrote !
Defense Strategy
I think you are very right about the "self-defense" strategy being the wrong one. " With self-defense "just enough force is used to stop the attack." If someone broke in your house and started attacking you, you would do whatever you could to stop them (like throw something at them or shoot them) and then you would scream and run like hell to get out. That is normal reaction - almost involuntary. And many people, despite the attacker being a bad guy, would still not want them to die - and would call an ambulance. So, because she didn't try to get out (jury question) and because she didn't stop at one cut one shot the jury had to think "Ok, why did she do this?"
The choices from there are
(1) She was super pissed at him for being spurned and all her rage came out with the repeated stabbings.
This might have worked if there was no evidence that she planned it (Murder 1). But, there was. I found
this video you might like. Although Jodi had an excuse for each of the factors that point to premeditation,
the probability that all of them could have happened is astronomical.
(2) She went temporarily crazy
Same problem - her premeditation activities. Plus, no doctors said she was crazy, right? And, no real evidence that Travis did anything horrific other than to tell her she wasn't marriage material.
Based on this, I think her best choice would probably have been to actually tell the truth. To focus completely on how he had sex with her - wanted her sometimes - but didn't want her as a wife/girlfriend. And, it infuriated her so much, she was going to confront him and if he didn't change his mind, kill him. This is definitely a Murder 1 admission - but perhaps she could have garnered an ounce of sympathy for a lesser charge. Doubtful, but her absolute only shot.
I think you are very right about the "self-defense" strategy being the wrong one. " With self-defense "just enough force is used to stop the attack." If someone broke in your house and started attacking you, you would do whatever you could to stop them (like throw something at them or shoot them) and then you would scream and run like hell to get out. That is normal reaction - almost involuntary. And many people, despite the attacker being a bad guy, would still not want them to die - and would call an ambulance. So, because she didn't try to get out (jury question) and because she didn't stop at one cut one shot the jury had to think "Ok, why did she do this?"
The choices from there are
(1) She was super pissed at him for being spurned and all her rage came out with the repeated stabbings.
This might have worked if there was no evidence that she planned it (Murder 1). But, there was. I found
this video you might like. Although Jodi had an excuse for each of the factors that point to premeditation,
the probability that all of them could have happened is astronomical.
(2) She went temporarily crazy
Same problem - her premeditation activities. Plus, no doctors said she was crazy, right? And, no real evidence that Travis did anything horrific other than to tell her she wasn't marriage material.
Based on this, I think her best choice would probably have been to actually tell the truth. To focus completely on how he had sex with her - wanted her sometimes - but didn't want her as a wife/girlfriend. And, it infuriated her so much, she was going to confront him and if he didn't change his mind, kill him. This is definitely a Murder 1 admission - but perhaps she could have garnered an ounce of sympathy for a lesser charge. Doubtful, but her absolute only shot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Newbie here. Came to discuss Jodi Arias trial? No threads? [View all]
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
OP
Better idea. Just block me and if anyone else wants to discuss one of the biggest trials
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#2
thanks LS !! It's pretty much over except for the sentencing - so moot
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#4
I, too, was surprised to not find a LOT of discussion of this very True Crime.
patricia92243
May 2013
#7
What i don't get - and probably never will - since Jodi is the only one who knows - but I
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#10
They are starting the death penalty phase. Victims family speaks. Then, on
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#9
I did hear yesterday that the mom wants to testify on her behalf BUT they didn't think it would be
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#15
Me too...but for some reason I always go into a mysterious murder case rooting for
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#14
I agree...there is no question that she was obsessed with him - maybe
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#17
thanks for reminding me. no news on Oct 4 hearing - how odd. But did find this
Laura PourMeADrink
Oct 2013
#28