Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

In reply to the discussion: Boxing [View all]

H2O Man

(75,711 posts)
6. He was an outstanding amateur.
Sat Jan 28, 2023, 08:55 PM
Jan 2023

Top level of international fighters. I'll say I find that impressive -- competing in the Olympics, etc -- because he really doesn't have the style to reach that level in three 3-minute rounds. The guy is made for the professional fights. I haven't watched film of Betervies at the amateur level, but I'll speculate his punching power decided a lot of those fights!

Since turning pro, he has obviously been outstanding. Some people wonder if he showed that he is slowing down. I think that this was a tough fight against a serious opponent. In my opinion, it would have taken one of the great light heavyweights to beat him. There were greater champions at that weight, but he'd have presented problems for any of them.

Yarde actually fought one of his very best fights. He lost, but he fought well. It's just that Beterbiev set a fast pace, and landed some hard body shots. Yarde tired out, but was still fighting back.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Boxing [View all] H2O Man Jan 2023 OP
Boxing... Ferrets are Cool Jan 2023 #1
Oh, it often is! H2O Man Jan 2023 #2
It is refreshing to hear that you acknowledge this. Ferrets are Cool Jan 2023 #3
My son frequently H2O Man Jan 2023 #4
Agree with your pick True Dough Jan 2023 #5
He was an outstanding amateur. H2O Man Jan 2023 #6
So this ought to True Dough Jan 2023 #7
It should get made. H2O Man Jan 2023 #8
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Boxing»Reply #6