Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Automobile Enthusiasts

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)

1. Why should she get the car back?

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Mon Feb 23, 2015, 12:25 PM

Feb 2015

The insurance company has paid her the value of it, and it is the insurance company who is the owner. It should be returned to the insurance company after a "lost title" process has been completed. This silly reporter is upset because the original owner cannot have both the insurance compensation and the car? Give me a break.

It is absurd to assume that North Carolina does not have procedures for issuing a new title when the original is lost. The reporter is engaging in nonsensical sensationalism.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Recovered after four-plus decades, stolen 1972 Corvette may not return to its original owner [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2015 OP

Why should she get the car back? JayhawkSD Feb 2015 #1

Yup. It should be issued a salvage title and resold, boo hoo. sir pball Mar 2015 #2