Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(16,625 posts)
8. The DH one sounds dumb to me... pitchers are fast(er) outs, and if you pinch hit for the pitcher,
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:10 PM
Feb 2019

which is a limited-use DH equivalent, the new pitcher can be warming up while your team is at bat. There is no significant delay involved there. The big delay involved in substituting for the pitcher is switching pitchers while your team is in the field. And the DH does not affect that. Substituting a higher batting average player for you lowest batting average player will only lengthen the game.

And the data backs this up. From a quick google search, I found that games between 2 AL teams are, on average, two minutes and 15 seconds longer than games between 2 NL teams.

Seems to me that people who favor spreading the DH to the NL under the guise of speeding up games are just people who favor the DH using a specious argument to try to spread it. If they follow the data, people wanting to speed up games should be favoring eliminating the DH from the AL instead (if indeed they insist on some DH-related action).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree with allowing a DH in the NL... ADX Feb 2019 #1
But I don't know how having the DH in the NL Ohiogal Feb 2019 #3
I don't think speeding up the game is part of the rationale... ADX Feb 2019 #6
Having a DH isn't baseball. CaptYossarian Feb 2019 #11
I'd be fine with adding the DH to the NL. bearsfootball516 Feb 2019 #2
I like it just the way it is Dave in VA Feb 2019 #4
I think both leagues should have the DH just for consistency, but don't speed it up... PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #5
"They only want to speed it up for the non-fan." Ohiogal Feb 2019 #13
I'm in favor of abolishing the DH for consistency The Polack MSgt Feb 2019 #19
I'm standing right next to you Ohiogal Feb 2019 #23
The real delay is allowing Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #7
yes. most baseball insiders say this is the number one problem Kurt V. Feb 2019 #10
That would help Timewas Feb 2019 #12
They already do that, Ohiogal Feb 2019 #14
I watched all summer Timewas Feb 2019 #16
I am an Indians fan, and watch almost all their games Ohiogal Feb 2019 #17
The DH one sounds dumb to me... pitchers are fast(er) outs, and if you pinch hit for the pitcher, RockRaven Feb 2019 #8
The whole point of baseball is that there is no clock Danmel Feb 2019 #9
There is no significant difference in AL vs. NL games if you throw out the 2 slowest and fastest LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 #15
Keep the batters in the box! gainesvillenole Feb 2019 #18
Two fewer :30 second commercials between innings. That's eight minutes right there. Auggie Feb 2019 #20
I absolutely support the three-batters-to-a-reliever-rule... First Speaker Feb 2019 #21
Don't speed it up. Baseball is the only sport I can think of that isn't timed. Leave it alone. kairos12 Feb 2019 #22
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»A question for baseball f...»Reply #8