Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
3. Sure
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:45 AM
Apr 2012

Well, the injustice in both case is the same, of course. I'm more likely to forgive a ref who didn't see the goal (and the German keeper cleared it pretty quickly) and doesn't give it because he's not sure than a ref who is absolutely certain he saw something that just wasn't there.

My preference is for a machine that goes "ping" when the ball crosses the line if that technology is accurate, but I'll go with video replay if it isn't.

How does the equivalent technology in ice hockey tell the difference between a puck and a skate or hand, btw? Is there a chip or RFID in the puck?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have to disagree on one point truebrit71 Apr 2012 #1
Sure Ron Obvious Apr 2012 #3
I like machines that go "ping".... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #4
MP Ron Obvious Apr 2012 #5
That was a pretty bad judgement call allowing the goal Marooned Apr 2012 #2
Apparently there was another goalline incident in Fulham - Wigan today Ron Obvious Apr 2012 #6
Video Replay Too DaveBrett Apr 2012 #7
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Soccer/Football»Goal line technology now!...»Reply #3