Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Random Boomer

(4,264 posts)
7. It's just not that simple
Wed Aug 18, 2021, 12:24 PM
Aug 2021

The line between species and sub-species is kinda fuzzy and always subject to change. Taxonomy is really an abstract concept we're trying to superimpose on nature, and our schema isn't always a precise fit.

For instance, wolves and dogs used to be considered separate species, now they're categorized as sub-species. They share approximately 99.9% of their DNA, which is more than enough commonality to enable cross-breeding. But even so, you can immediately tell when you're looking at a wolf versus a dog.

Humans share approximately 99.7% of their DNA with Neanderthals, so no, we're not the exact same species, but we're pretty close. Yet we're different enough that humans would have recognized that Neanderthals were "not us" upon running into each other.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When We Met Other Human Species [View all] Uncle Joe Aug 2021 OP
Am I crazy? wryter2000 Aug 2021 #1
Nope... 2naSalit Aug 2021 #2
He keeps referring to "other human species." wryter2000 Aug 2021 #3
Got it. I think I would have done the same. 2naSalit Aug 2021 #4
I know what you mean wryter2000 Aug 2021 #5
That would be it, exactly. 2naSalit Aug 2021 #6
It's just not that simple Random Boomer Aug 2021 #7
Thanks, very informative wryter2000 Aug 2021 #8
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»When We Met Other Human S...»Reply #7