Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

John1956PA

(3,417 posts)

4. Good comparison. STNG's Q and his "kin" emerged from the science of the universe.

Reply to defacto7 (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 19, 2017, 06:52 AM

Oct 2017

The humanoid appearance of Q, portrayed devilishly by John Delancey, was utilized by the character so as not to shock the Enterprise crew whom he routinely taunted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

As an atheist there is one kind of "god" I could actually believe it. But would it be a "god"? [View all] Binkie The Clown Oct 2017 OP

And what about "Q"? defacto7 Oct 2017 #1

Good comparison. STNG's Q and his "kin" emerged from the science of the universe. John1956PA Oct 2017 #4

Right, the Q seemed to be a hyper-advanced alien race... trotsky Oct 2017 #5

I'm happy just believing Mr.Bill Oct 2017 #2

Is that pantheism? Cartoonist Oct 2017 #3

How about circular... defacto7 Oct 2017 #6

"sacred" implies "special" but if EVERYTHING is special then Binkie The Clown Oct 2017 #8

Then it would mean... defacto7 Oct 2017 #9

How about sub-atomic? AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #7

Technically Speaking... Lachrymologist Nov 2017 #10

In my favorite construct, life represents an invasion... Freelancer Nov 2017 #11

Ineresting idea! I like it. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2017 #12

If it's not a god (and it's not one), then you still wouldn't believe in one. Iggo Nov 2017 #13