Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,033 posts)
8. I agree, but...
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 08:09 AM
Jan 2018

...given that so much of today's "modern" religious thinking is derived from the scriptures for the explicit purpose to prop up scripture, I can see the systematic study from a skeptical point of view providing a beneficial framework for criticism.


Recognize that most of biblical scholarship is still largely part of an ecclesial-academic complex that renders it very distinct from other areas of the humanities and social sciences, especially insofar as it seeks to protect and preserve religion as a valuable feature of human existence;

Aim to expose the bibliolatry that still lies at the core of biblical studies insofar as most biblical scholars believe the Bible should be a vital part of modern cultures or bears superior ethical values;

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TL;DR Voltaire2 Dec 2017 #1
Atheists have read and studied the Bible Maggiemayhem Dec 2017 #2
I agree but this manifesto is about academic studies. Voltaire2 Dec 2017 #4
No doubt... NeoGreen Dec 2017 #3
This would end religion Cartoonist Dec 2017 #5
You say that like it's a... NeoGreen Dec 2017 #6
I don't think study of *scripture* is particularly important; it's modern religious thinking muriel_volestrangler Jan 2018 #7
I agree, but... NeoGreen Jan 2018 #8
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»The Second Wave of the Ne...»Reply #8