Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)

7. No, it doesn't.

Reply to kristopher (Reply #6)

Wed Sep 14, 2016, 01:31 PM

Sep 2016

You seem to have preconceived notions that aren't open to discussion, and your history of wanting to ignore science makes your take here rather questionable, to be kind.

That's not really worth my time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Study: Sugar Industry Secretly Paid Harvard Researchers to Blame Fat for Health Risks [View all] kristopher Sep 2016 OP

At the time, researchers all over the country were noticing a generational increase Warpy Sep 2016 #1

That simply doesn't hold water; it's bunk and explicitly refuted by the evidence found. kristopher Sep 2016 #2

You're assuming one grant covered all research everywhere Warpy Sep 2016 #3

Write your opinion to Dr. Kearns, she is the one refuting your claim kristopher Sep 2016 #4

A more balanced perspective than the hype of today's "press." HuckleB Sep 2016 #5

That just tries to gloss over the corruption in academic research. kristopher Sep 2016 #6

No, it doesn't. HuckleB Sep 2016 #7

It's amazing how those who shout "science" loudest always go straight to personal attacks. kristopher Sep 2016 #8

Mr. Pot? Have you met Mr. Kettle? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2016 #9

Walking around muttering to yourself again? kristopher Sep 2016 #10

Muttering to myself, eh? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2016 #11

And we're still waiting kristopher Sep 2016 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author HuckleB Sep 2016 #13

Awww. That's cute. HuckleB Sep 2016 #14

Really?? kristopher Sep 2016 #15

The press, sir, is reporting on a peer-reviewed study. JackRiddler Oct 2016 #19

And the press did not give the full story. HuckleB Nov 2016 #20

That's some fantasy you have there. JackRiddler Nov 2016 #21

So when no fat started weight started going up. That is very telling! ScienceIsGood Sep 2016 #16

The glycemic index; the glycemic load kristopher Oct 2016 #17

Thanks for the great info. n/t ScienceIsGood Oct 2016 #18