Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A white privileged trump voter told me this [View all]Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)17. Iran is a huge cleavage point, here is a really good article on it
President Trump and the Iran Nuclear Deal
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/16/president-trump-and-the-iran-nuclear-deal/
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office over the coming months, one of the thorniest foreign policy questions he will have to address is what to do about the Iran nuclear deal. During the campaign, then-candidate Trump repeatedly criticized the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action for being insufficiently tough and threatened to walk away from the agreement if elected.
Trumps critiques of the deal have merit. While the deal has slowed Irans progress towards a fully realized nuclear program, the front-loaded nature of the sanctions relief means that Iran has enjoyed many of the benefits before fully living up to its obligations for the duration of the agreement. Similarly, the deals sunset provisions mean that the agreement at best delays Irans program and, in many ways, provides them with a patient pathway to the bomb.
Further, the promised vigorous enforcement of non-nuclear sanctions related to Irans continued support for terrorism, human rights abuses, and the development of ballistic missiles has yet to materialize, in large part because the Barack Obama administration appears reluctant to threaten the stability of the deal. And though Obama promised that sanctions could be snapped back into place if Iran was found in violation, in truth the triggering of such a mechanism would be politically difficult, particularly because many of our allies may no longer share the same concerns about Irans malign activities.
Yet, while the JCPOA is imperfect, tearing up the agreement during Trumps first few weeks in office would carry significant consequences. Although the president could walk away from the agreement and re-impose sanctions, Iran has already received approximately $100 billion. Walking away would allow Iran to continue its work on the nuclear program while enjoying this significant financial windfall.
snip
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/16/president-trump-and-the-iran-nuclear-deal/
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office over the coming months, one of the thorniest foreign policy questions he will have to address is what to do about the Iran nuclear deal. During the campaign, then-candidate Trump repeatedly criticized the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action for being insufficiently tough and threatened to walk away from the agreement if elected.
Trumps critiques of the deal have merit. While the deal has slowed Irans progress towards a fully realized nuclear program, the front-loaded nature of the sanctions relief means that Iran has enjoyed many of the benefits before fully living up to its obligations for the duration of the agreement. Similarly, the deals sunset provisions mean that the agreement at best delays Irans program and, in many ways, provides them with a patient pathway to the bomb.
Further, the promised vigorous enforcement of non-nuclear sanctions related to Irans continued support for terrorism, human rights abuses, and the development of ballistic missiles has yet to materialize, in large part because the Barack Obama administration appears reluctant to threaten the stability of the deal. And though Obama promised that sanctions could be snapped back into place if Iran was found in violation, in truth the triggering of such a mechanism would be politically difficult, particularly because many of our allies may no longer share the same concerns about Irans malign activities.
Yet, while the JCPOA is imperfect, tearing up the agreement during Trumps first few weeks in office would carry significant consequences. Although the president could walk away from the agreement and re-impose sanctions, Iran has already received approximately $100 billion. Walking away would allow Iran to continue its work on the nuclear program while enjoying this significant financial windfall.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
a shit tonne of RW'ers actually think Putin is a good guy, and he has shed the "commie" shit.
Grey Lemercier
Nov 2016
#9
How about everyone indulge in some introspection and admit it was a fked up year all around?
JHan
Nov 2016
#69
Yep, as others point out, Trump has taken money and then some from foreign governments.
Garrett78
Nov 2016
#58
the B-word is right below the surface with a whole lot of Trump voters. surprise. not. nt
TheFrenchRazor
Nov 2016
#83
That fucking idiot couldn't point to Syria on a map if you floated him the first two letters of
Maru Kitteh
Nov 2016
#63
Yeah yeah, Trump is a "liberal". As a racist predatory capitalist, he's the "change" candidate too
emulatorloo
Nov 2016
#18
Trump voters are going to be in for a nasty shock when he proves he's no isolationist nt
maryellen99
Nov 2016
#46
campaign Hillary said, no boots on ground to assist russia & assad. tumps wants to help russia
Sunlei
Nov 2016
#27
This has been on my mind lately..Do you think the Republicans are going to reinstate the draft? Nt
maryellen99
Nov 2016
#42
Your counter-example is only one anecdote. It does not defeat the "clearer jobs message" angle. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2016
#47
No, of course not. I think it was hubris that she was run and ran. But that said, its kind of
JCanete
Nov 2016
#61
OK...what you've actually done there is made the case that Hillary couldn't get elected.
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#70
Really.. They wouldn't have voted for any Dem, but I said Hillary was unelectable?? wokay..
boston bean
Nov 2016
#80