Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

zenabby

(364 posts)

6. I understand,

Reply to Exilednight (Reply #5)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 01:57 PM

Nov 2016

but that's what Greg Palast is trying to prove. We have the provisional ballots. these people were purged illegally. He is demanding the names of the people who were on the purge list to take it to court so that he can prove that it was disproportionately and intentionally minority, and get these provisional ballots counted. The fraud is Crosscheck, and he is trying to prove it. It could have/should have done before the election, but like someone else said, we thought we were going to win and didn't pay enough attention to it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Understanding the recount - pls read [View all] zenabby Nov 2016 OP

we all read this in RS in October jodymarie aimee Nov 2016 #1

Very interesting..nm speaktruthtopower Nov 2016 #2

This can address future elections but not past BainsBane Nov 2016 #3

That's what you'd think.. zenabby Nov 2016 #4

But they will not be unless the voter followed the provisional rules. Exilednight Nov 2016 #5

I understand, zenabby Nov 2016 #6