Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who should have been the democratic party nominee for president? [View all]lunamagica
(9,967 posts)121. Hillary Clinton. She was the best qualified for the job, and would have made an excellent president
I deeply believe that not having her as POTUS is a terrible loss for us.
And there is no way that I will believe that being 2.5 million ahead in votes and losing an election is legally possible. Something really dirty went on. She won
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
197 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It would have been difficult to beat any of the last 3 GOP hopefuls. People forget how bad GOP
stevenleser
Nov 2016
#76
Biden, Bernie, or Elizabeth would of won easily... but, it was Hillary's turn and, as they say, the rest is history.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2016
#104
It's Bernie's turn, of course... just like it was Hillary's turn after she lost to Obama.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2016
#191
The one who won the primary by MILLIONS of votes. Really, you're going down this road?
MADem
Nov 2016
#4
The jury returned their verdict. It's over. It's done, she loss, move on. This is as pathetic as
Exilednight
Nov 2016
#49
I don't understand the recount due to the fact she will not get the required EVs.
Exilednight
Nov 2016
#65
Unfair as it is, with Republicans in control there will be no amendment to change the EC.
Exilednight
Nov 2016
#71
Hillary was chosen by 2,350,000 more voters than DT. (And her lead is still increasing.)
pnwmom
Nov 2016
#120
The 7 million third party votes had a huge impact. If about a hundred thousand of them in key states
pnwmom
Nov 2016
#171
If they were never going to vote for Hillary they were willing to let Trump win;
pnwmom
Nov 2016
#177
Any serious nomination challenge to Clinton would have been a bloodbath
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Nov 2016
#125
It wasn't just that we lost the election, it's because we nominated an establishment candidate
Exilednight
Nov 2016
#140
But gerrymandering DOES affect things like how many polling sites there are in a district,
LisaM
Nov 2016
#94
I actually refer to the little fuhrer as president Camacho sometimes too! nt
Lucky Luciano
Nov 2016
#146
Debbie Wassermann Schultz rigged it so Bernie was marginalized right from the beginning and
RKP5637
Nov 2016
#29
There's that "Southern states" horse shit again. Democrats in every state get to vote in the primary
BobbyDrake
Nov 2016
#30
Me too. They've earned a heaping serving of "Right back at you" from now on.
BobbyDrake
Nov 2016
#42
Minnesota doing well? The Rethugs just won control of both Chambers of the State
Grey Lemercier
Dec 2016
#193
Sadly, Hillary had a lot of baggage. I think Joe Biden would have done better. n/t
RKP5637
Nov 2016
#27
Sanders, of course. Don't confuse the DU consensus for the real world. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2016
#40
I think Hillary could have won, if only she had treated the fall campaign as a partnership
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#43
I know she said it there, Skinner. But after that, she never spoke like that again.
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#68
Ooops. Good memory sir. That was in mid-July, Sanders finally "got out there".....
George II
Nov 2016
#72
If she had said anything close to this, we'd be looking at President-elect Clinton.
Tatiana
Nov 2016
#185
Considering how elections are won by 2016 standards, someone who is a bigger liar than Trump
mtnsnake
Nov 2016
#45
Hillary won the popular vote by a wider margin than any candidate, win or lose, since the 1870s
Squinch
Nov 2016
#47
Elizabeth Warren seems like an obvious answer, but she didn't want the job
geek tragedy
Nov 2016
#63
The Democrats were so stupid. If only they had nominated Kirill Shamalov, it would have been a
still_one
Nov 2016
#82
Joe Biden... most honest person in politics... he would have defeated any R...
MyNameIsKhan
Nov 2016
#84
What about Warren? She had all of Hillary's good points, but nothing Trump could attack her for.
Ken Burch
Nov 2016
#145
they didn't want a populist outsider. they wanted a bigot who would ban and kick out "those" people
JI7
Nov 2016
#156
Hillary Clinton. She was the best qualified for the job, and would have made an excellent president
lunamagica
Nov 2016
#121
Biden would have won. Sanders would have gotten crushed. Hillary was my 2nd choice. I had no 3rd.
Grey Lemercier
Nov 2016
#176
I'm concerned now about 2020 wondering who that might be! Trump was/is a superb con artist, but
RKP5637
Nov 2016
#179
As much as I am now coming down on the septuagenarians, I think Warren could have won.
randome
Nov 2016
#180
Senator Elizabeth Warren. She can speak to the Occupy Wall Street generation, she can get a crowd
Dems to Win
Nov 2016
#187
Personally I would have preferred Sanders- that's why I voted for him in the primary, of course- but
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2016
#189