You could see it coming. Hillary should never have run in 2016.

[mtnsnake]

By 2016, she was way too flawed, had too much baggage, plus she wasn't one of the better campaigners. In fairness to her, though, 2016 would have been a little more difficult election for any Democrat to win because it is rare in modern times for a party to win 3 consecutive terms in a row.

If she hadn't lost to Barack Obama in the 2008 primaries, she would most likely have won the general election and become the first woman president back then. Eight miserable years of Bush and Cheney helped to open up the doors for us in 2008. Running in 2016 was a different story.

Even though Hillary was such a qualified candidate, she had way too much baggage, she was not nearly as good a campaigner as someone like Obama was, and it's hard for one party to win 3 consecutive elections in a row. The only ray of hope she had of winning this time around was when Trump became her opponent. It was perfect. Nobody could possibly lose to that disgusting piece of shit liar. Yet she couldn't even beat that bum in any of the states where it counted. Yes, Comey may have had a hand in it, but come on, this was Trump we were running against, not Reagan.

Had Obama not come along to make history, 2008 would have been Hillary's year to make history, not 2016. By 2016 too many people across the country had had enough of the Bushes and Clintons. But she just had to be the first woman president.