Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What would re-establish trust here? [View all]Raster
(20,999 posts)4. I think we need more outreach to those that did not vote...
...No one is going to change the minds of the hardcore tRumpistas... their minds are made up and they don't want to be concerned with facts or logic. We need new, fertile ground and minds.
I agree, best to find people who already share our core beliefs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps, as you said, it requires abandoning attempts at blaming some Democrats, and candidates,
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#1
A combination of rage, defiant hope, and creativity would serve us well right now.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#18
I think tapping into the "rage" of new and uninformed voters backfired this time, and I'm not sure
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#37
Hillary didn't lay a hand on Sanders. Some surrogate said he was "unfit" based on his limited
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#49
He didn't put down Planned Parenthood so much as disagree with its choice to intervene in the race
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#59
Insulting PP was a cheap shot at women's expense, period. Showed his commitment quite clearly.
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#96
The difference was Bernie's support was votes and Hillary's support was actions which PP articulated
seaglass
Dec 2016
#99
Stop thinking of the party as a club. It's not - it's a vehicle for imposing governance philosophy.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2016
#8
Is there any form of critique of Hillary's campaign you could accept as legitimate?
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#12
There is no more value in bashing Hillary than there is Dukakis. And for the same reason.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2016
#31
Well, the rules there prohibited supporting Hillary and the rules here require it. So who were you
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#51
They are still fighting the primaries over there and screaming how they were rigged against Bernie.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#57
"Bernie Bros"! "Bernie stayed in too long!" "He shouldn't've shown up her weaknesses!"
JudyM
Dec 2016
#100
A campaign that doesn't just talk about poverty(as this one did, to its credit)...
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#17
Ultimately, it's about reconnecting the poor to those of us who AREN'T in the same condition.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#32
Thank you for this post ........ Yes there are some exceptions ( I think excptions can be
Kathy M
Dec 2016
#25
I immediately heard these lines go through my head in response to your first paragraph:
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#21
I was saying that throughout the fall campaign, and had been for years before that.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#33
Mostly agree. We also need to stop the BS rhetoric that our loss was Sanders/his supporters' fault.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#101
You sound like you're much more interested in holding grudges than winning future elections. nt
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#98
Yep. I'm sick of this shit, it's a ploy. They never appreciated the fact she deserved their support
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#55
More outreach to rural Dems in purple states (like Obama did), and engage the disengaged.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#66