Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
8. I see your point
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 01:46 AM
Dec 2016

100 people vote. 51 vote for Trump. 49 vote for Clinton. Trump wins.

100 people vote. 48 vote for Trump. 49 vote for Clinton. 3 don't vote. Clinton wins.

100 people vote... Oh, what the hell. There are so many possibilities. The thing is, everybody voting doesn't guarantee our candidate winning. We have to turn out our voters, not gripe at people for staying home or voting for Jill Stein. It's not any person's duty or obligation to vote for our candidate. When we approach voters that way, when we tell them they have to vote for our candidate or else, it may occur to people we're not being real affirmative. We could lose elections that way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because scapegoating DemonGoddess Dec 2016 #1
And scapegoating does something else. HassleCat Dec 2016 #5
Actually, voting third party WAS just like voting for Trump DemonGoddess Dec 2016 #7
I see your point HassleCat Dec 2016 #8
K&R! stonecutter357 Dec 2016 #2
The problem is Flavius Aetius Dec 2016 #3
Welcome to DU. n/t musicblind Dec 2016 #4
Hillary knew the EC rules going in Omaha Steve Dec 2016 #10
I think some of it is to prevent cognitive dissonance. musicblind Dec 2016 #6
they have the presidency, house, senate, most state legislatures and governorships Amishman Dec 2016 #9
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary beat Trump by Mil...»Reply #8