Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: ADL has 'serious concerns' whether Ellison can lead DNC [View all]baldguy
(36,649 posts)46. There are many reasons to oppose Ellison that don't involve besmirching his faith.
But that's all the OP and his fellow travelers seem to do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does the ADL attack the State of Israel for its treatment of Israeli Arabs, Christians,
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#58
I already mentioned a few of the numerous countries that are massive human rights violators.
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#67
When they attempt to influence US policy and frame what is considered acceptable thought
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#71
Must be incredible to "know" what a movie is about so you can dismiss it without
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#82
The truth that Israel is treated far differently than most other violators of human rights.
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#5
Well, we do not really know what their secret services might have done for the US.
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#55
And some actual liberals can overlook the human rights violations committed by the State of Israel.
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#68
Well not a whole lot different than we treat ourselves though, so there's that. nt
JCanete
Dec 2016
#81
Whether it is valid or not the question is as a DNC chair would this create a distraction to do the
still_one
Dec 2016
#23
you just made the point much better than I was trying to do. The DNC chair needs to bring people
still_one
Dec 2016
#48
And the question of "creating a distraction" could apply to anyone who has ever made a public
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#52
Anyone who perpetuates propaganda against Jews has no place in a leadership role, yet alone our
grossproffit
Dec 2016
#6
Did you miss this part? His implying that Jews run our government? That has NO place in our party.
grossproffit
Dec 2016
#12
That's what this article is about. The "inconvenient truth" that the first poster was referencing.
grossproffit
Dec 2016
#21
He's suggesting that US policy harms the vast majority of people in that region of the world.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#29
This has nothing to do with anti-Semitism, and is in no way comparable to Steve Bannon.
DanTex
Dec 2016
#13
accusing America's foreign policy of being "controlled" by a much smaller and less wealthier
TuslaUltra
Dec 2016
#16
When someone purposely says that Jews run the government, that is anti-Semitism.
grossproffit
Dec 2016
#17
I agree. But I was talking about Keith Ellison's remarks on US policy towards Israel, which have
DanTex
Dec 2016
#20
Give me a break. Ellison made a statement about foreign policy that you disagree with.
DanTex
Dec 2016
#43
Controversial, sure. A lot of statements about Middle East politics are controversial.
DanTex
Dec 2016
#47
This is looking like a smear campaign by an islamophobic conspiracy theorist
Hong Kong Cavalier
Dec 2016
#28
I like Ellison and I understand his position on Israel. I just don't think he is the man or woman...
phleshdef
Dec 2016
#31
There are many reasons to oppose Ellison that don't involve besmirching his faith.
baldguy
Dec 2016
#46