Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What would re-establish trust here? [View all]closeupready
(29,503 posts)87. Okay, done with you. Bye!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps, as you said, it requires abandoning attempts at blaming some Democrats, and candidates,
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#1
A combination of rage, defiant hope, and creativity would serve us well right now.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#18
I think tapping into the "rage" of new and uninformed voters backfired this time, and I'm not sure
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#37
Hillary didn't lay a hand on Sanders. Some surrogate said he was "unfit" based on his limited
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#49
He didn't put down Planned Parenthood so much as disagree with its choice to intervene in the race
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#59
Insulting PP was a cheap shot at women's expense, period. Showed his commitment quite clearly.
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#96
The difference was Bernie's support was votes and Hillary's support was actions which PP articulated
seaglass
Dec 2016
#99
Stop thinking of the party as a club. It's not - it's a vehicle for imposing governance philosophy.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2016
#8
Is there any form of critique of Hillary's campaign you could accept as legitimate?
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#12
There is no more value in bashing Hillary than there is Dukakis. And for the same reason.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2016
#31
Well, the rules there prohibited supporting Hillary and the rules here require it. So who were you
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#51
They are still fighting the primaries over there and screaming how they were rigged against Bernie.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#57
"Bernie Bros"! "Bernie stayed in too long!" "He shouldn't've shown up her weaknesses!"
JudyM
Dec 2016
#100
A campaign that doesn't just talk about poverty(as this one did, to its credit)...
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#17
Ultimately, it's about reconnecting the poor to those of us who AREN'T in the same condition.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#32
Thank you for this post ........ Yes there are some exceptions ( I think excptions can be
Kathy M
Dec 2016
#25
I immediately heard these lines go through my head in response to your first paragraph:
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#21
I was saying that throughout the fall campaign, and had been for years before that.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#33
Mostly agree. We also need to stop the BS rhetoric that our loss was Sanders/his supporters' fault.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#101
You sound like you're much more interested in holding grudges than winning future elections. nt
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#98
Yep. I'm sick of this shit, it's a ploy. They never appreciated the fact she deserved their support
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#55
More outreach to rural Dems in purple states (like Obama did), and engage the disengaged.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#66