Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Paladin

(29,057 posts)

8. The only negatives that seem to count around here are HRC's.

Reply to NRQ891 (Original post)

Sat Dec 3, 2016, 03:06 PM

Dec 2016

Trump's negatives make whatever shortcomings she had seem minimal by comparison---but he seems to be getting away with it without much criticism. As usual.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the fact that both candidates had historically high negatives being ignored? [View all] NRQ891 Dec 2016 OP

No one knows what to do with it zipplewrath Dec 2016 #1

good points nt NRQ891 Dec 2016 #2

Not true that HRC recevied 6M fewer votes than Obama 2012. HRC received only 1.1 million fewer votes Fla Dem Dec 2016 #4

Not my intent zipplewrath Dec 2016 #5

I listened to NPR at noon the next day NRQ891 Dec 2016 #3

Yes. Only HRC's negatives mattered, because Russia said so, and Trump is Vladmir's chump, and so LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #6

what i felt... djsunyc Dec 2016 #7

The only negatives that seem to count around here are HRC's. Paladin Dec 2016 #8

GOP set up Hillary for failure --negatives of both candidates WERE the key factors in this election andym Dec 2016 #9