Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Are people underestimating the 'No More Bushes or Clintons' sentiment this election? [View all]Buzz cook
(2,627 posts)14. Thanks for the false equivelence
The Bush family can trace its political roots back to Franklin Pierce. Grandpa Bush was a senator and Bush I was in politics most of his life. Bush II and Jeb were groomed for office from birth and got massive backing from family connections.
Both Clintons were self made people. Bill was raised in relative poverty and Hillary in a middle class home. They both got higher education through their own merits and got into office in spite of massive opposition from entrenched power.
There is a huge media campaign against the Clintons and one of the lies that people on the left have bought into is that the two families are just alike.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are people underestimating the 'No More Bushes or Clintons' sentiment this election? [View all]
NRQ891
Dec 2016
OP
Im talking about the public perception of what at one point in time was a likely choice of finalists
NRQ891
Dec 2016
#5
Thanks. I cannot count that high, but I did just post the following separately:
guillaumeb
Dec 2016
#13
Do we decide who wins the World Series or Super Bowl by how many fans they have?
Exilednight
Dec 2016
#41
Are you underestimating Russia's interference with this election by overestimating other factors?
blm
Dec 2016
#26
well he seems stupid because based on their record Obama is much more pro free trade
JI7
Dec 2016
#37
Bill Clinton had a very high approval rating when he left office, which was nearly 16 years ago.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#28
PEOPLE WERE DEMANDING HILLARY CLINTON AS OUR NOMINEE! THAT'S WHY SHE WAS VIRTUALLY THE ONLY CHOICE
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#32