Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Sanders campaign manager: Don't buy David Brock's blame game for Clinton loss [View all]
Sanders campaign manager: Don't buy David Brock's blame game for Clinton lossJeff Weaver
The Hill
Brocks narrative that Hillary Clintons loss is the fault of the millennial voters who supported the primary campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders is laughable. Its worth noting that Anna Greenberg, an informed political professional who followed Brock as a speaker at the State Innovation Exchange conference, was quick to distance herself from his baseless analysis.
Novembers result highlights the central challenge that the Democratic Party faces building a party that represents the interests and aspirations of middle and working class Americans of all races. When elements of the party spend decades supporting job destroying trade deals and cozying up to Wall Street and other corporate interests, it only makes sense that working people and young peoples confidence in the party as a whole has been shaken, if not shattered.
And this is not limited to white voters. Turnout in places like Detroit and Milwaukee reveal that the partys problems cross racial lines.
Rather than face the very real challenge of remedying this situation, some have taken to blaming pollsters and data analysts for Hillary Clintons loss. After all, its much easier to bash those who didnt see the wheels coming off the train rather than asking why the wheels were coming off in the first place.
Novembers result highlights the central challenge that the Democratic Party faces building a party that represents the interests and aspirations of middle and working class Americans of all races. When elements of the party spend decades supporting job destroying trade deals and cozying up to Wall Street and other corporate interests, it only makes sense that working people and young peoples confidence in the party as a whole has been shaken, if not shattered.
And this is not limited to white voters. Turnout in places like Detroit and Milwaukee reveal that the partys problems cross racial lines.
Rather than face the very real challenge of remedying this situation, some have taken to blaming pollsters and data analysts for Hillary Clintons loss. After all, its much easier to bash those who didnt see the wheels coming off the train rather than asking why the wheels were coming off in the first place.
In the next few months, Bernie Sanders will go back to being just another voice in the Senate, and Hillary Clinton will most likely (at least according to Terry McAuliffe) retire from politics, but this schism will remain.
Sander's message drew more millennial votes than the Clinton and Trump campaigns combined in the primary season, and this generation just recently displaced the baby boomers as the largest population. It's not hard to figure out where we need to go in the future.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders campaign manager: Don't buy David Brock's blame game for Clinton loss [View all]
portlander23
Dec 2016
OP
Turnout was down due to GOPs successful vote-suppression tactics in SWING STATES. Weaver shouldn't
blm
Dec 2016
#7
That faction seems to let the GOP off the hook a lot. It seems to be a mutual admiration society.
R B Garr
Dec 2016
#9
Is there any way to validate any of these theories? This sounds about right based on my volunteering
JudyM
Dec 2016
#12
More young people voted for Bernie Sanders than Trump and Clinton combined by a lot
portlander23
Dec 2016
#15