Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hueymahl

(2,687 posts)
5. Good article and analysis. Thanks.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:05 AM
Dec 2016

I do take issue with its conclusion/premise (the author kinds of works both ends), i.e., that it is a myth that HRC ignored the working class, because in a sense, that is exactly what she did. No, she did not ignore them in the sense that she had comprehensive policies that, if enacted, would help them and all americans. But politically, she allowed herself to be painted by the republicans as a politician that pandered to the working class but really aligned herself with the ultra-wealthy. In this sense, she failed in her outreach to that segment of the population which is easily interpreted as "ignoring".

Ultimately, as great a person as she is and as great a president as she would have made, she was just not a very good politician.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Atlantic: The Dangero...»Reply #5