Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

FBaggins

(27,903 posts)

10. Yes and no

Reply to MichMary (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 8, 2016, 12:19 PM

Dec 2016

One state would be enough if we could show clear signs that the election was stolen. That might open other states up to scrutiny (perhaps legal/criminal processes rather than standard recounts).

However - if the election was stolen, then WI had to be part of it, and the recount there is almost complete (and looks clean)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

From Daily Kos: State of the Recount: Michigan halted, hearing in PA, WI 70% complete (accurate?) [View all] Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 OP

I thought the 6th Court approved the recount. DK504 Dec 2016 #1

They didn't FBaggins Dec 2016 #3

WI accurate jodymarie aimee Dec 2016 #2

It won't matter MichMary Dec 2016 #9

Palmer report has some news California_Republic Dec 2016 #4

Bill is that you? Welcome to DU Ellipsis Dec 2016 #6

PA is probably not going anywhere FBaggins Dec 2016 #5

Disparate impact of the Michigan Law exboyfil Dec 2016 #7

Do PA and WI matter anymore? MichMary Dec 2016 #8

Yes and no FBaggins Dec 2016 #10

What were the WI predictions before the election and what about the exit polls? Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 #11

I think they were predicting that Wisconsin would go for Hillary MichMary Dec 2016 #12

Both were about the same FBaggins Dec 2016 #13