Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
15. it should not have been close enough to steal
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:56 PM
Dec 2016

the only reason they were close and the only reason they have been able to create this alternate reality in which these ignorant corrupt lying global warming denying nutjobs can get elected because of a private email server and other bullshit is the free speech free ride they get with 1200 think tank coordinated radio stations.

we have to get house and senate in 2 years and can if the left/dems do something about talk radio

and if your state universities are helping trump radio attract advertisers to pay for global warming denial and defunding public ed, making excuses for trump, trying to end net neutrality, and generally everything undemocratic, protest anything trump there.

and tell their student groups and newspapers this:

xxxxxx

Your school is on a list of 88 universities at republiconradio.org that broadcast sports on 257 of Rush Limbaugh’s 600 radio stations. They could also be called Trump radio stations.

Your university is not only mocking it’s own mission statement, it is undermining the interests of most of its students, faculty, employees, and surrounding communities.

That makes your own school a legitimate place to protest any issue related to the Trump agenda.

Many of those relationships began prior to the 90’s, before they all began broadcasting propaganda for one party. There is no reason for those schools not to start looking for apolitical alternatives immediately.

The school administration will claim that it does not make business decisions based on politics.This is a question all those schools need to ask: If a radio station went to KKK programming would the university still let its mascot be used to sell a KKK agenda?

Those stations weigh in on elections for university regents and selection of administration including presidents and chancellors - is there a conflict of interest?

All of those stations will continue to deny global warming, deny reproductive rights to women, excuse racism and homophobia, and promote and excuse the Trump agenda. Republicans want to privatize public education, social security, and the post office. Their policies will raise college tuition. They want to reverse gains in health care reform. They want to end net neutrality. Those stations will be cheerleaders for the next war, as they were for the last one.

The station pays a licensing company a fee and the school gets a part of that. The station then gets to use the school logos, mascot, and community standing to attract advertising revenue. It gets to declare things like “850 KOA, home of the Buffs,and Rush Limbaugh!” Compared with TV licensing revenue talk radio stations pay very little.

Advertising revenue is used to fund station operating costs and pay for the national and local talk show hosts that broadcast from them most of the day.

Except for occasional innocuous programming all of those stations operate exclusively for the benefit of the Republican Party. They are coordinated with national and state GOP and their allied think tanks

If Trump would pay $1000/hr for a radio ad, 1200 nationwide stations x 15hrs/day x 5 days/week are worth about $5BIL/yr FREE for Trump. 255 x $75,000 = $19,125,000/WEEK FREE for Trump, or about $1BIL/yr endorsed by institutions of higher learning.

Those stations, licensed to operate in the public interest, are heavily dependent on the schools they parasitize and they all:
- deny global warming and science
- use public airwaves to sell voter suppression legislation
- use and excuse racism, misogyny, homophobia, and hate to divide communities
- work to deny reproductive rights for women and access to contraception
- fight environmental regulation, push fracking, and always support fossil fuel solutions over renewables
- fight to defund and privatize public education, attack teachers and work to lower their salaries, attack their unions, push voucher solutions and standardized testing, and obstruct efforts to lower student debt
- fight efforts to increase minimum wage
- undermine the economic and environmental interests of their communities
- use public airways to repeat propaganda that is demonstrably false and continue to lie after being corrected
- use public airwaves but use call screeners to exclude dissenting callers

How much revenue does the licensing company pay for radio broadcasting portion compared to the TV portion? Could donors make up the difference if there is a monetary loss? If there is a loss, how does it compare with the harm it is doing to its own principles, funding, students, and surrounding communities?

Are they violating their 501c3 tax exempt status? Here’s the IRS rule for political activity:
“Political activity. -  If any of the activities (whether or not substantial) of your organization consist of participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, your organization will not qualify for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3). Such participation or intervention includes the publishing or distributing of statements.”

No university has a good excuse not to reexamine it’s relationship with partisan radio stations and look for apolitical alternatives. If an existing contract cannot be voided without penalty, can donors be found to cover it?

Any university, state or private, supporting Republican talk radio is shooting itself in the foot, demeaning its mission statement and professed goals and values, and harming its students’ futures.

Here is that list of universities ($1000 x 15hrs/day x 5days = $75,000/week):

ALABAMA 8 $600,000 Auburn 3, Alabama 2, Southern Alabama 2, Troy 1
ARIZONA 1 $75,000 Arizona St. 1
ARKANSAS 3 $225,000 Arkansas 3
CALIFORNIA 5 $375,000 San Jose State 2, USC 2, Fresno St. 1
COLORADO 4 $300,000 Air Force 2, Colorado 1, Colorado State 1
CONNECTICUT 1  $75,000 Connecticut 1
FLORIDA 20 $1,500,000 Florida 10, Florida St. 4 Miami 2, South Florida 2, Central Florida 2
GEORGIA 14 $1,050,000 Georgia 7, Georgia Tech 5, Georgia Southern 2
IDAHO 7 $525,000 Boise St. 4, Idaho 3
ILLINOIS 7 $525,000 Illinois 7
INDIANA 11 $825,000 Notre Dame 6, Purdue 4, Indiana 1
IOWA 5 $375,000 Iowa 4, Iowa St. 1
KANSAS 4 $300,000 Kansas St. 2, Kansas 1, Wichita St. 1
KENTUCKY 3 $225,000 Louisville 2, Kentucky 1
LOUSIANA 3 $225,000 LSU 2, La.-Monroe 1
MARYLAND 2 $150,000 Maryland 2
MASSACHUSETTS 1 $75,000 Boston College 1
MICHIGAN 19 $1,425,000 Michigan St. 11, Michigan 7, Western Michigan 1
MINNESOTA 4 $300,000 Minnesota 4
MISSISSIPPI 6 Mississippi St. 3, Mississippi 2, Southern Miss 1
MISSOURI 6 $450,000 Missouri 6
NEBRASKA 6 $450,000 Nebraska 6
NEVADA 1 $75,000 Nevada 1
NEW JERSEY 2 $150,000 Rutgers 1, Seton Hall 1
NEW MEXICO 3 $225,000 New Mexico 2, New Mexico St. 1
NEW YORK 7 $525,000 Syracuse 6, Army 1
NORTH CAROLINA 16 $1,200,000 North Carolina 8, North Carolina State 3, Duke 3, East Carolina 2
OHIO 10 $750,000 Ohio St. 6, Toledo 1, Dayton 1, Bowling Green 1, Xavier 1
OKLAHOMA 5 $375,000 Oklahoma St. 3, Oklahoma 1, Oral Roberts 1
OREGON 12 $900,000 Oregon St. 7, Oregon 5
PENNSYLVANIA 14 $1,050,000 Penn St. 11, Pittsburgh 2, Temple 1
SOUTH CAROLINA 4 $300,000 South Carolina 2, Clemson 2
TENNESSEE 7 $525,000 Tennessee 4, Memphis 3
TEXAS 16 $1,200,000 Texas A&M 9, Texas Tech 4, Texas 1, Texas Christian 1, Baylor 1
UTAH 1 $75,000 Utah St. 1
VIRGINIA 6 $450,000 Virginia Tech 5, Virginia 1
WASHINGTON 6 $450,000 Washington 5, Washington St. 1
WEST VIRGINIA 2 $150,000 West Virginia 1, Marshall 1
WISCONSIN 5 $225,000 Wisconsin 5

There is no excuse for any school to support Trump radio.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But, but mcar Dec 2016 #1
I must have missed the CNN thing? Blanks Dec 2016 #2
Corey Lendowski- double dipping by getting paid by both CNN and Trump- seen getting off the Trump bettyellen Dec 2016 #6
Very true, actually. Unreality is the new reality, R B Garr Dec 2016 #3
+1 nt NCTraveler Dec 2016 #4
Not only that, we must beat OURSELVES up and become more like Squinch Dec 2016 #5
Everything you learned about being a decent human being is now void. VOX Dec 2016 #7
The media is most to blame for this mess. No doubt about it. nt Lucky Luciano Dec 2016 #8
The media picked all of our candidates quakerboy Dec 2016 #9
hey, remember when cheeto's first campaign manager (recruited him to run?) mopinko Dec 2016 #10
if we could only power the world on lies. MythosMaster Dec 2016 #16
K&R betsuni Dec 2016 #11
Oh, there's a few things missing from that list. byronius Dec 2016 #12
"I did not say this... They_Live Dec 2016 #13
Great post. LisaM Dec 2016 #14
Thank you for that. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #23
it should not have been close enough to steal certainot Dec 2016 #15
It wasn't. They had to resort to suppression *AND hacking, *AND* the FBI becoming a de facto arm of LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #17
Yep. nt duffyduff Dec 2016 #18
it was close enough to steal is my point. many issues like global warming are certainot Dec 2016 #19
stop blaming the victim, "if he was close enough to hit you, you deserve to be battered" LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #21
i'm blaming dems/left/liberals for the biggest political mistake in history certainot Dec 2016 #22
The thing is, there is no smoking gun for hacking ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #28
The thing is...framing the narrative as though we need to have smoking guns is only LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #29
We need hard evidence ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #30
When all 19 intel agencies say it was a Russian hack, I have no idea how much MORE proof you need LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #31
No intelligence agency has claimed that Russia directly changed the vote count ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #32
Aaaah..."directly changed the vote count" is *your* metric, I see. LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #33
You haven't decided a metric ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #34
Do you believe they weren't? nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #35
I haven't seen evidence ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #36
So you don't think they were? nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #37
Are you trying to avoid my question ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #38
As it seems you are trying to avoid mine... LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #39
I asked first. You should answer. ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #40
ABC News: "Russian hackers targeted nearly half of states' voter registration systems... spooky3 Dec 2016 #41
I don't think that no one doubts they were poking around ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #43
I think this is why McCain is right about needing spooky3 Dec 2016 #44
I agree ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #45
It's not a matter of being optimistic or pessimistic spooky3 Dec 2016 #46
How can this be said after the EMPIRICAL data of Russia hacking and voter suppression unless you uponit7771 Dec 2016 #24
if the polls show them down 10 or 20, which would be closer to certainot Dec 2016 #25
Gotta be careful with the conspiracy talk. Rex Dec 2016 #20
Remember when every newspaper and all the former Presidents and their families ... Botany Dec 2016 #26
It's strange how quickly the narrative changes ucrdem Dec 2016 #27
Thank you, LaydeeBug! Cha Dec 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey! Remember when Trump ...»Reply #15