Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(95,734 posts)
19. I often use the syntax of the poster I am replying to; don't know if I did this time
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 04:08 AM
Dec 2016

In any case, when I do so it is to emphasize a point by mirroring them.

Be that as it may, I've been here long enough to be known as a legitimate and loyal self-identified Democrat. This is my party since 1968, Hillary was my candidate, and I'm Still With Her.

Not everyone here is a Democrat; that's pretty clear. And we have a flood of newbies (or at least low postcount under their current name) and we are still in the sorting out stage with a lot of them. I am getting very tired of the ones continually emphasizing how "historically unpopular" Hillary was and is. (For an unpopular candidate she sure as hell won a massive amount of the popular vote.) And telling us how the solution to winning the EC is to move further left so we can capture the votes of conservative rural whites clinging to their guns and Bibles. Something in that does not compute, but I keep reading it here.

The system is rigged against Democrats 6 ways from Sunday. Our tent needs to be bigger, and inclusive of Blue Dog Dems and others considered impure by many on the left. The more pure we get, the smaller our tent will be. If we want people in red states to elect Democrats, we will have to run candidates who can speak their language, and that means in those states they will be in the center, not the left.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Disagree. J_William_Ryan Dec 2016 #1
Both can be true. TDale313 Dec 2016 #3
California get's screwed. Tommy2Tone Dec 2016 #5
The Electoral College by it's nature TDale313 Dec 2016 #9
Pls enjoy your stay. The electoral college is a relic of slavery and needs to go so loser repugs . . brush Dec 2016 #6
Democrats nominated someone so unpopular she won the popular vote by 3,000,000 over.... Hekate Dec 2016 #8
Thank you. cwydro Dec 2016 #13
I am getting real tired of it, let me tell you Hekate Dec 2016 #14
I'm trying to ignore it. cwydro Dec 2016 #15
Read that poster's comment again. Quackers Dec 2016 #17
I often use the syntax of the poster I am replying to; don't know if I did this time Hekate Dec 2016 #19
Oh, BS! The only place Hillary was more unpopular than Trump Lil Missy Dec 2016 #11
You left out Comey and Putin triron Dec 2016 #12
Yes. cwydro Dec 2016 #16
1. Clinton won the popular vote by 3,000,000 C Moon Dec 2016 #18
One can only hope!! No way, in good conscience, they should vote in that shit stain Nazi tRump! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2016 #21
And seeing how Republicans now dominate state legislatures Kotya Dec 2016 #28
Sone truth to what you're saying. If only Bernie... what might have been! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2016 #20
This is false on its face, she got 3 million more votes than him so she's not more unpopular whateve uponit7771 Dec 2016 #22
malarkey apcalc Dec 2016 #26
The 270 pact is probably our best shot. TDale313 Dec 2016 #2
If that can work, fine. But we can't keep installing the unqualified repug losers brush Dec 2016 #7
Well-- MichMary Dec 2016 #23
Don't blame anyone but Comey, the Russians, and the media triron Dec 2016 #4
Again, we have to multitask. TDale313 Dec 2016 #10
I disagree bowens43 Dec 2016 #24
In theory maybe, but not in practice. apcalc Dec 2016 #27
I'm all for a thorough autopsy... Orsino Dec 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ok. The election was stol...»Reply #19