Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Considering that Republicans lie and make up all sorts of shit rurallib Dec 2016 #1
I believe it is deeper than that, I had one 60+ told me they don't CK_John Dec 2016 #3
Considering she won the popular vote by such a margin, I can't agree. WheelWalker Dec 2016 #2
Exactly the opposite. earthside Dec 2016 #4
No the polls didn't show it from the moment she announced Buzz cook Dec 2016 #5
There's no doubt Clinton hate is strong, and has been for decades. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #6
So she was over qualified and Palin was under qualified, and a jerk like Perry ends CK_John Dec 2016 #7
No way she would have won if not for the two year witch hunt in Congress and on Fox news, doc03 Dec 2016 #8
no doubt a lot of men went into the voting booth and could not vote for a woman for POTUS, TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #9
Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million.other countries have female presidents so can't be that. Sunlei Dec 2016 #10
You are about a Century behind the rest of us. n/t Lil Missy Dec 2016 #11
Well for having only gotten the vote in 1920 and 60% of eligible voter didn't vote, 2020 might CK_John Dec 2016 #12
Yeah, right. Coyotl Dec 2016 #13
No, she won, her campaign team f***ed this up... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #14
Peter theil certainly thinks we were better off before women could vote La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #15
Ann Coulter: Women Should Not Have The Right To Vote, But They Can Still Write Books CK_John Dec 2016 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IMO, no female would have...»Reply #15