Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
7. I don't know exactly how many WWC people voted for Clinton but it was a lot.
Sat Dec 31, 2016, 10:58 AM
Dec 2016

And she won among the working class overall. A segment of *white* working class voters have different priorities than the working class as a whole, and we know why.

A white backlash has been building for 8 years, including some who voted for Obama.

I'd rather the Democratic Party focus on fighting voter suppression and gerrymandering, while also attempting to engage the disengaged (the 40% or so that doesn't typically vote in presidential elections and the 60% or so that doesn't vote in mid-term elections). Democrats also need to promote media literacy and critical thinking in schools, while drawing attention to the GOP's complicity in millions subscribing to patently false beliefs.

But I will say more outreach to rural areas of purple states (where there are Democrats, not all of whom are white), without needing to change the message, is something the 2020 candidate needs to do. As Obama said, you have to try to minimize the losses in those areas in order to carry the state. And some people simply won't vote absent a GOTV effort aimed at them. Again, suggesting more outreach to rural Democrats in purple states is not the same as suggesting a change in message.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Really? blue cat Dec 2016 #1
Take a good look around... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #2
"Fuck 'em. All Trump voters deserve what they get." Beartracks Dec 2016 #27
Politico..... Laurian Dec 2016 #3
All workers matter True_Blue Dec 2016 #4
THIS all fucking day long LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #6
The very idea of the WWC is racist. baldguy Dec 2016 #8
And it suggests that working class POC must not care about economic issues. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #9
Right. Our focus should be on Employees. Basic LA Dec 2016 #12
+1... SidDithers Dec 2016 #14
You don't consider ot a voting bloc in the same way they break the dionysus Dec 2016 #16
So, how do you propose to address their "special needs" without resorting to alt-right fascism? baldguy Dec 2016 #18
but hispanics don't differentiate by claiming they are working class JI7 Dec 2016 #19
Well, "white poor and lower middle class" or the old "white blue collar" might be more dionysus Dec 2016 #20
it's not the term itself but more how it's talked about JI7 Dec 2016 #21
I see what you're saying. dionysus Dec 2016 #22
Exactly. Some seem to think "working class" is synonymous with white. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #25
They're trying desperately to get us to care True_Blue Dec 2016 #23
Exactly baldguy Dec 2016 #24
no, they stole the election the way they take them all. They used the American media. Focusing on JCanete Dec 2016 #28
faulty advisors isn't a valid excuse. GeorgeGist Dec 2016 #5
I don't know exactly how many WWC people voted for Clinton but it was a lot. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #7
It's the battle to keep Identity Politics front and center even after the disaster of 2016. jalan48 Dec 2016 #10
So, you really think a Politico article is going to be the one thing that finally sells its? kcr Dec 2016 #11
The desires of the WWC are, by definition, different... SidDithers Dec 2016 #13
I'm not white but I still get the distinction... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #15
he openly ran as a racist. they had other choices in the primary JI7 Dec 2016 #17
That doesn't excuse the WWC from embracing lies and fantasy instead of Clinton's realistic plan. LonePirate Dec 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you support Hillary an...»Reply #7