Occupy Underground

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)

1. They are performing an 'audit' and doing a 'review'. Therefore, under these circumstances

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:52 PM

Apr 2016

no delegates should be awarded to either. If an audit or review still means they cannot fix this, make it right, as in there cannot be a re-vote? Then the next course of action would be to nullify the results and campaigners move on, lessons learned by the cheaters, or split the delegates evenly. With what is already known, no delegates should be awarded without a resolution. The results are not real. They should be chucked!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who Purged All The Voters In New York? [View all] scottie55 Apr 2016 OP

They are performing an 'audit' and doing a 'review'. Therefore, under these circumstances ViseGrip Apr 2016 #1

Sounds good to me. Ed Suspicious Apr 2016 #2

Sounds good, but we all know it won't change a thing for this election. Conveniently. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #6

I Am Not Trying To Make A Point (This Time) scottie55 Apr 2016 #3

You have every right to be suspicious. Too much has happened in this primary. desmiller Apr 2016 #4

As I predicted... Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #5

you did call it kip questionseverything Apr 2016 #7

Yeah, I saw that... 70 vote discrepancy favoring Hillary on one machine audit. I have paid Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #8

THIS is where we need Anonymous to hack into DNC and Podesta group servers FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #9

^This. K&R nt TBF May 2016 #11

Who indeed. It's no mystery: stopbush Apr 2016 #10