Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
6. I agree, they didn't degrade. And I think those hard-core types are not what true anarchists are.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 03:45 PM
Mar 2012

Because violent actions are by their nature, reactionary. In acting that way, they are only reflecting the worst of the 1% terrorists and in that way, empowering the 1%. They love to see us destroy each other.

People must consider the intent of their own hearts, like the sign at OWS, being held by woman saying, 'I'm sorry I did not love you enough,' or something to that effect.

When I mention 'degrading' I must confess I know people who closed out their BoA accounts in the action some time ago and bragged about it online. They said that they made sure they told them 'just what they thought of 'em!'

IMHO, that was abusive. Those bank tellers didn't have any control over the situation, but had to deal with the stress of being treated with contempt, as the enemy.

Because those who are angry at what Wall Street has done,
well, we see that they look down from their offices and laugh at the drama playing out below them. They seldom are put to the test, they are merely entertained.

Just as the royals of days gone by sat with their picnic above battle scenes and watched the chess pieces on their board kill each other. A game, nothing but a game, in which they seldom lost anything, but the pawns lost everything.

There are times when we who need to be lifted up and seek it for our fellows, get tribal. We go after the easy target, the one who is closest to us in social station. This is a method that the rightwing employs, looking with judgment at those who they hope are beneath them and can abuse. The poor, the sick, the others. It's petty and venal denies the humanity of the other person. It's icky, is all I can say.

I've been on strike and watched scabs go to work while I carried my picket sign, but said nothing as I realized that in most cases in my experience, getting a temporary job as a scab was move up in some people's lives. They couldn't get the job before when our union was in charge, because they weren't qualified.

So I considered, who had been blessed and who had not, who had been shut out of employment. And just how desperate these people were. If we'd abused them as they walked past us, they'd hate unions. This has happened in several situations that I've seen.

I remember too, one day while I stood on picket as two men in delivery trucks jumped out. They were delivering flowers and fancy fruits to what I guess we'd now call one-percenters, to a very fancy hotel downtown.

The first one handed me some of the prettiest strawberries I'd ever seen. He said 'They won't miss it!' and away he went. The second one said one of the customers refused some flowers and gave me a bouquet of roses and took off.

We are all human, we can all love, we are all equal. We need to treat each other with the utmost respect and from what I've seen, most of Occupy is better behaved than a lot of us were in the anti-war era of the sixties and seventies.

But then, the 1% were literally killing young men en masse. We'll see how this all comes out.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Occupiers set up living r...»Reply #6