Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

(870 posts)

2. burning and smashing

Thu Feb 23, 2012, 07:30 AM

Feb 2012

could cause injury.

and unlike republicans I am always open to different ideas.
information I haven't considered can still sway my opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Had a very interesting discussion [View all] flobee1 Feb 2012 OP

By your definition customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #1

Bullshit cbrer Feb 2012 #7

My point is customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #12

I agree cbrer Feb 2012 #16

burning and smashing flobee1 Feb 2012 #2

All activities on your list is a violent response except rosesaylavee Feb 2012 #3

MLK zipplewrath Feb 2012 #4

It is about civil disobedience zeemike Feb 2012 #5

You always take that position. DocMac Feb 2012 #8

Ok Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #13

Maybe i'm mistaken. DocMac Feb 2012 #19

Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #20

I am very sympathetic to ideals of Satyagraha nonviolence Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #15

if your heart is sincere unionworks Feb 2012 #9

violent offenses include rape and assault. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #10

Are we talking about graffiti artwork, or tagging slogans in public places? Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #14

the question should be, are these acts strategically net positive nashville_brook Feb 2012 #17