Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

By your definition customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #1
Bullshit cbrer Feb 2012 #7
My point is customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #12
I agree cbrer Feb 2012 #16
burning and smashing flobee1 Feb 2012 #2
All activities on your list is a violent response except rosesaylavee Feb 2012 #3
MLK zipplewrath Feb 2012 #4
It is about civil disobedience zeemike Feb 2012 #5
destruction of property is violence. attacking, even in self defense is violence. Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #6
You always take that position. DocMac Feb 2012 #8
Ok Warren Stupidity Feb 2012 #13
Maybe i'm mistaken. DocMac Feb 2012 #19
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #20
I am very sympathetic to ideals of Satyagraha nonviolence Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #15
if your heart is sincere unionworks Feb 2012 #9
violent offenses include rape and assault. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #10
Flobee1, unless I speak up you and many other OWS's will never know what a great debt of gratitude.. nenagh Feb 2012 #11
Are we talking about graffiti artwork, or tagging slogans in public places? Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #14
the question should be, are these acts strategically net positive nashville_brook Feb 2012 #17
Rebecca Solnit wrote a great piece on this question in the book, "Occupy: Scenes from an Occupied rhett o rick Feb 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Had a very interesting di...»Reply #13