Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)

5. I have no idea what you mean- it's a bit ambiguous.

Reply to antiquie (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 17, 2012, 02:11 PM

Sep 2012

Permanent blockage for this one case. Or extended to all cases.

Morning coffee not kicking in and more explanation appreciated.

We have already had the SCOTUS crowd approve of letting a guy whose crime was being black while driving being forced to have body cavity searchers. The ruling on that case was draconian enough. (No woman should approve of this ruling - I can clearly remember the joy that Chicago PD took in deciding that women driving late at night could be prostitutes, with coke up their snatch. So for decades, women after midnight needed to make sure someone was with them so they weren't abused by police.)

The NDAA needs complete removal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NDAA Case: Indefinite Detention Injunction Does Irreparable Harm, Obama Admin. Lawyers Argue [View all] Fire Walk With Me Sep 2012 OP

Spam deleted by tkmorris (MIR Team) EileenMock Sep 2012 #1

Indefinite Detention Does Irreparable Harm n/t Downwinder Sep 2012 #2

Exactly. n/t DLevine Sep 2012 #4

I choose to believe antiquie Sep 2012 #3

I have no idea what you mean- it's a bit ambiguous. truedelphi Sep 2012 #5

I totally agree NDAA needs complete removal. antiquie Sep 2012 #6