1.. Rut it like a group with as much democracy as possible and require significant consensus and give hosts less autonomy in host power decision-making.
2. Run it like a regular group with as much democracy as possible but expect less consensus and give hosts a bit more autonomy in host power decision making.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1252137
3. Run it like a regular group but with hosts selected via indirect run-off elections with the hosts voting on the lead host with no consensus model.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1252157#post26
4. Operate like a forum for the most part with no hosts.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1252137#post7
This is probably somewhat of a simplification. But I tried to summarize the basic ideas.
There is general agreement in the first three proposals on the necessity for elections, for a time limit on the term, for recall, and for election procedure to be anonymous polling.
don't hurt me 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read