Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Leopolds Ghost

(12,875 posts)
9. Yes, and strangely enough, Forbes.com is the ones who first got it right.
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:43 PM
Feb 2012

Occupy is about occupying physical space and creating a physical community for democracy and dissent. Ignoring that is getting off theme.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2049429

Now why there are so many Occupy-friendly articles on Forbes, probably has something to do with the number of anonymous Paulbots working there or something. But this article (see link) doesn't read like a fan of Ron Paul -- it reads like an unreconstructed leftie libertarian idealist.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»To occupy or not to occup...»Reply #9