Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,933 posts)
4. .....
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 08:14 PM
Apr 2013
That provision, added to the bipartisan bill aimed at halting insider trading by members of Congress, would have required roughly 28,000 senior government officials to post their financial information online, and had come under harsh criticism from federal government employee unions.


The new law scraps a provision that had been hotly contested by federal employees, as well as found to be problematic and even dangerous for high-ranking government workers. Congress twice had passed legislation to delay its implementation. Under that provision, high-ranking government workers would have been required to post their financial information on a publicly available online database.
Under a previous delay, Congress called for the National Academy of Public Administration to study the implications of the requirement. The report, released in March, found the provision should be repealed, having found that it could needlessly threaten the safety of government employees abroad, as well as make it difficult to attract and retain talent in the public sector.


http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/1007-other/293919-obama-signs-stock-act-step-back#ixzz2QaJ3UD00



Doesn't seem like that big of a deal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Somewhere, Romney is snickering. djean111 Apr 2013 #1
so DJ13 Apr 2013 #2
The Most Transparent Administration Ever™ limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #3
..... ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2013 #4
not easy to find info on this Skittles Apr 2013 #5
So why don't the repugs like him? newfie11 Apr 2013 #6
Becaue they all work for the banksters and it's only a show to make us think we have a choice Fire Walk With Me Apr 2013 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #13
what.. the... fuck.... NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #7
yea really! president romney would have been so much better leftyohiolib Apr 2013 #10
I voted for Obama, because I thought he would be better than Romney NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #12
Well isn't that just wonderful. progressoid Apr 2013 #8
kick DarkLink Apr 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»ACTION ALERT: STOCK Act R...»Reply #4