Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Social Security & Medicare
In reply to the discussion: Social Security: The Best and Worst Years To Be Born [View all]OMGWTF
(4,470 posts)25. IIRC, SS benefits were not taxed until St. Ronnie Raygun went on his mission to destroy the middle class.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sounds about right, I was born in 1949 and I'm very happy with my Social Security
Walleye
Jan 2024
#1
"The best birth year in the modern era? That would be 1949".. me too. My buddy who was born the same year
mitch96
Jan 2024
#40
IIRC, SS benefits were not taxed until St. Ronnie Raygun went on his mission to destroy the middle class.
OMGWTF
Jan 2024
#25
Lol. Thanks! Not sure whether that's a benefit or cost. I was curious mostly because in my younger years,
KPN
Jan 2024
#42
It is sort of a scale from 0 to 15 with zero being the best and 15 being the worst
Shermann
Jan 2024
#44
Right and if and when you make it to 76, it extends to 12.29 years instead of 11.97
Shermann
Jan 2024
#63
I, too, was born in '52. My social security was reduced by the amount I receive from Japan for the national pension
Martin68
Jan 2024
#33
On a sorta kinda positive note, you can't really lose money that you never had! nt
Shermann
Jan 2024
#45