Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

11. Note the names of who voted NO above.

Reply to freshwest (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 4, 2013, 07:15 AM

Apr 2013

Some of the biggest people on this board who are 100% of the time, in 100% synch with the NRA.

A small pro-NRA faction, just like in America, outshouting the vast, vast majority who wants to end the insanity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you make a death threat towards somebody, you should be banned for life from owning firearms [View all] CreekDog Apr 2013 OP

Oh, yeah? Well, I resent this poll and if you don't take it down I'll... tularetom Apr 2013 #1

Due process matters. As long as it is in someway fairly adjudicated ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #2

the question did NOT say if you are "accused" of making a death threat CreekDog Apr 2013 #3

I considered the question ambiguous ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

From one of the biggest negative-Great Equalizer Mike Bloomberg people around. graham4anything Apr 2013 #10

Gunboy from GD apparently all for guns for threateners Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #5

almost everyone voting against this is almost a non-entity outside the Gungeon CreekDog Apr 2013 #14

Depends on the situation and what the judge/jury decide. nt CokeMachine Apr 2013 #6

Before or after they follow through on the threat? We're dealing with officials being threatened. freshwest Apr 2013 #7

If it is a felony and the person is found guilty, no gunz. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #9

Note the names of who voted NO above. graham4anything Apr 2013 #11

Thanks for the civil response -- I'll give it some thought. CokeMachine Apr 2013 #13

Anyone that threatens another person's life should be considered to be unbalanced. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #8

I think it makes sense to elevate a legitimate death threat to a felony. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #12

No offence CreekDog.... defacto7 Apr 2013 #15

"It's a no-brainer." In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #16

But the people with no-brains are still saying no to anything reasonable... freshwest Apr 2013 #17

Tell me about it. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #18