Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 02:06 PM Mar 2013

I Am A Firearms Owner. [View all]

I have owned andused many different types of firearms, up to and including semiautomatic- fire rifles and handguns, and still own many to this day.

My father, at age 83 is a Korean War Marine vet has been an active firearms user and is a collector of military firearms with a historical value all of his life.

He is still active in adding to his collection.

When a much younger man, Dad was a Civil War re-enactor. He still owns an actual woolen government-issue Union uniform, along with the cartridge belt, canteen, etc. all purchased for next to nothing from shops when he was but a young man.

Dad's original 1863 Springfield musket hangs over my fireplace, still in operating condition.

One of my earliest childhood memories was going with him as a family and camping out while he was on bivouac with his Union regiment.

Each of us five kids was taught firearms safety, and how to shoot when we were old enough to understand the responsibility that goes along with using a deadly weapon.

Dad, along with my older brother and I are former NRA members, having left that organization when they lost their minds back in the 80's.

One of the firearms I currently own is one of the first Colt model AR-15 semiautomatic rifles that was produced for civilian use, new in the original box, never fired, bought waaay before the "Black Rifle" craze swept through the shooting world.

I would have no problem whatsoever with rules being implemented and enforced as to how and to whom I may sell or transfer any firearm I own, having turned down potential purchasers before because they just skeeved me right the fuck out.

I would welcome a global background check that encompassed all sales, public and private. I have no problem registering any firearm I own, as I do not fear confiscation by the government on a whim or without due process.

I would have no problem with a potential firearm owner (of any kind) showing that (s)he has attended a safety course much like those mandated now for a CCW permit.

I would like to know that any person that I have dealings with regarding sales to or from are above-board, have no criminal records or serious mental health issues, and that no firearm I previously owned was used in the a criminal act of any kind.

I have never felt or expressed the need to carry a weapon in public, concealed or otherwise, even though I have worked in some of the highest crime-rate areas of town for many years over the course of my life.



I would like to think that I am a typical Democratic firearm owner, open to common sense solutions to a very real and serious problem that plagues this nation.

I am by no means an absolutist, which seems to be the current way to interpret gun rights under the 2nd.

Gun violence does not happen in a vacuum.

There are reasons why it happens, and if we can all work together to reduce those reasons, one at a time, or all at once, then we all need to do work in that direction.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Am A Firearms Owner. [View all] Ikonoklast Mar 2013 OP
isn't it funny that the anti-regulation folks all say they fear the Govt. will know their address Vincardog Mar 2013 #1
I fear that the NRA will do far more damage to lawful ownership of firearms that any other group. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #2
it's a lunatics idea. here's why samsingh Mar 2013 #4
i've been trying to explain that to the gun fuckers, but they're insistent.. frylock Mar 2013 #8
and yet many will support a 'mental health' registry that is open to the public for review samsingh Mar 2013 #13
I would have agreed with you at one time Mojorabbit Mar 2013 #28
great post. thank you. samsingh Mar 2013 #3
Excellent post. I tend to draw the line at carrying guns in public, particularly in cities. Hoyt Mar 2013 #5
I'm a Buckeye, ex-Conneticut via the Western Reserve of Ohio. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #6
DURec. bvar22 Mar 2013 #7
Fee? Just as long as it wasn't punitive, covering the cost of paperwork and administration, nope. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #9
A Fee that YOU don't see as punitive, bvar22 Mar 2013 #15
I believe that can be taken care of, no reason a few dollars should keep anyone from their rights Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #30
Questions...you are in a somewhat unique, but certainly not rare situation.. jmg257 Mar 2013 #10
You should do some research..... rdharma Mar 2013 #11
They are not "arguments", they are about real-life gun owners dealing with reasonable restrictions jmg257 Mar 2013 #12
Like I said........ do some research rdharma Mar 2013 #14
The Garand has a fixed capacity magazine greater then 7 rounds. jmg257 Mar 2013 #16
fixed capacity magazine greater then 7 rounds rdharma Mar 2013 #17
But the GUN is illegal to buy. It has a fixed capacity magazine greater then 7. jmg257 Mar 2013 #18
No it doesn't ......... rdharma Mar 2013 #19
It does. Like an SKS, it has a fixed capacity magazine, often charged jmg257 Mar 2013 #20
Does anyone really care? ellisonz Mar 2013 #21
Depends if anyone wants to buy an M1 or SKS I guess. jmg257 Mar 2013 #22
I don't think the OPs pop even cares that much. ellisonz Mar 2013 #24
Well, he hasn't responded, so maybe. No doubt we need better control. jmg257 Mar 2013 #29
You are concerned about the availability of doc03 Mar 2013 #36
I am not really concerned as I am not affected, and don't plan on being so. jmg257 Mar 2013 #37
The NRA went nuts with the arrival of LaPiere, I quit doc03 Mar 2013 #38
Yes, some people care. Crepuscular Mar 2013 #25
Why do you care? ellisonz Mar 2013 #27
Get a five round en-block...... problem solved. rdharma Mar 2013 #23
IF a gun with a fixed mag greater then 7 is illegal, then it is NOT jmg257 Mar 2013 #26
The M1 Garand does NOT have a fixed magazine! rdharma Mar 2013 #31
I hear you..but I very strongly disagree. Eta jmg257 Mar 2013 #32
"the clip is fed into the receiver, not a magazine" rdharma Mar 2013 #33
'Duh' on my part...tried finding it...no magazine listed as a part for an M1. jmg257 Mar 2013 #35
No "duh" needed. Straw Man Mar 2013 #40
Thanks for your take on it. jmg257 Mar 2013 #41
Hey - just as interesting wrap-up... jmg257 Mar 2013 #39
I have owned a gun - in the country, for shooting rattlesnakes only. freshwest Mar 2013 #34
My grandmother always used a brick wyldwolf Mar 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»I Am A Firearms Owner.»Reply #0