Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: I Am A Firearms Owner. [View all]jmg257
(11,996 posts)20. It does. Like an SKS, it has a fixed capacity magazine, often charged
With a clip.
Typically 10 round for the SKS, 8 rounds for the M1.
Are SKSs still legal to purchase? (after the enforcement date)
ETA: and if they are, then I apologize profusely, as I do not read the new law that way. Why exempt 'tubular magazines for .22 rimfire' if all other fixed mags are just fine?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
isn't it funny that the anti-regulation folks all say they fear the Govt. will know their address
Vincardog
Mar 2013
#1
I fear that the NRA will do far more damage to lawful ownership of firearms that any other group.
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#2
and yet many will support a 'mental health' registry that is open to the public for review
samsingh
Mar 2013
#13
Excellent post. I tend to draw the line at carrying guns in public, particularly in cities.
Hoyt
Mar 2013
#5
Fee? Just as long as it wasn't punitive, covering the cost of paperwork and administration, nope.
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#9
I believe that can be taken care of, no reason a few dollars should keep anyone from their rights
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#30