Gun Control Reform Activism

jmg257

(11,996 posts)

32. I hear you..but I very strongly disagree. Eta

Wed Mar 20, 2013, 06:52 PM

Mar 2013

Though you may be right...Per FM 23-5, the clip is fed into the receiver, not a magazine.

Brilliant!

So the clips aren't considered ammunition feeding devices (by DOJ, CA DOJ anyway), and it doesn't have a magazine.

Cheers, and apologies!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I Am A Firearms Owner. [View all] Ikonoklast Mar 2013 OP

isn't it funny that the anti-regulation folks all say they fear the Govt. will know their address Vincardog Mar 2013 #1

I fear that the NRA will do far more damage to lawful ownership of firearms that any other group. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #2

it's a lunatics idea. here's why samsingh Mar 2013 #4

i've been trying to explain that to the gun fuckers, but they're insistent.. frylock Mar 2013 #8

and yet many will support a 'mental health' registry that is open to the public for review samsingh Mar 2013 #13

I would have agreed with you at one time Mojorabbit Mar 2013 #28

great post. thank you. samsingh Mar 2013 #3

Excellent post. I tend to draw the line at carrying guns in public, particularly in cities. Hoyt Mar 2013 #5

I'm a Buckeye, ex-Conneticut via the Western Reserve of Ohio. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #6

DURec. bvar22 Mar 2013 #7

Fee? Just as long as it wasn't punitive, covering the cost of paperwork and administration, nope. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #9

A Fee that YOU don't see as punitive, bvar22 Mar 2013 #15

I believe that can be taken care of, no reason a few dollars should keep anyone from their rights Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #30

Questions...you are in a somewhat unique, but certainly not rare situation.. jmg257 Mar 2013 #10

You should do some research..... rdharma Mar 2013 #11

They are not "arguments", they are about real-life gun owners dealing with reasonable restrictions jmg257 Mar 2013 #12

Like I said........ do some research rdharma Mar 2013 #14

The Garand has a fixed capacity magazine greater then 7 rounds. jmg257 Mar 2013 #16

fixed capacity magazine greater then 7 rounds rdharma Mar 2013 #17

But the GUN is illegal to buy. It has a fixed capacity magazine greater then 7. jmg257 Mar 2013 #18

No it doesn't ......... rdharma Mar 2013 #19

It does. Like an SKS, it has a fixed capacity magazine, often charged jmg257 Mar 2013 #20

Does anyone really care? ellisonz Mar 2013 #21

Depends if anyone wants to buy an M1 or SKS I guess. jmg257 Mar 2013 #22

I don't think the OPs pop even cares that much. ellisonz Mar 2013 #24

Well, he hasn't responded, so maybe. No doubt we need better control. jmg257 Mar 2013 #29

You are concerned about the availability of doc03 Mar 2013 #36

I am not really concerned as I am not affected, and don't plan on being so. jmg257 Mar 2013 #37

The NRA went nuts with the arrival of LaPiere, I quit doc03 Mar 2013 #38

Yes, some people care. Crepuscular Mar 2013 #25

Why do you care? ellisonz Mar 2013 #27

Get a five round en-block...... problem solved. rdharma Mar 2013 #23

IF a gun with a fixed mag greater then 7 is illegal, then it is NOT jmg257 Mar 2013 #26

The M1 Garand does NOT have a fixed magazine! rdharma Mar 2013 #31

I hear you..but I very strongly disagree. Eta jmg257 Mar 2013 #32

"the clip is fed into the receiver, not a magazine" rdharma Mar 2013 #33

'Duh' on my part...tried finding it...no magazine listed as a part for an M1. jmg257 Mar 2013 #35

No "duh" needed. Straw Man Mar 2013 #40

Thanks for your take on it. jmg257 Mar 2013 #41

Hey - just as interesting wrap-up... jmg257 Mar 2013 #39

I have owned a gun - in the country, for shooting rattlesnakes only. freshwest Mar 2013 #34

My grandmother always used a brick wyldwolf Mar 2013 #42