Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Progressive Media Resources Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 10:58 AM Nov 2013

"The Dynastic Hillary Bandwagon: Bad for America" [View all]

A voice from outside the MSM:

Published on Saturday, November 9, 2013 by Common Dreams

The Dynastic Hillary Bandwagon: Bad for America

by Ralph Nader



The Hillary Clinton for President in 2016 bandwagon has started very early and with a purpose. The idea is to get large numbers of endorsers, so that no Democratic Primary competitors dare make a move. These supporters include Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), financier George Soros and Ready for Hillary, a super PAC mobilizing with great specificity (already in Iowa).

~snip~

Everybody knows that Hillary is for women, children and education. She says so every day. But Democrats and others can’t get the Clintons even to support a $10.50 federal minimum wage that would almost equal the 1968 minimum wage, inflation-adjusted, and would raise the wages of 30 million workers mired in the gap between the present minimum wage of $7.25 and $10.50 an hour. It just so happens that almost two-thirds of these Americans are women, many of them single moms struggling to support their impoverished children. Nearly a million of these workers labor for Walmart, on whose Board of Directors Hillary Clinton once sat. Words hide the deeds.

As a Senator on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hillary had to start proving that women, just like the macho men, can be belligerent and never see a weapons system and its use that they didn’t like. Never did she demonstrate any ongoing interest in debloating the massive, wasteful, duplicative military budget so as to free up big monies for domestic public works programs or other necessities.

As Senator she also admitted that she didn’t have time to read a critical National Intelligence Estimate Report, which had caveats that might have dissuaded her from voting with George W. Bush to invade Iraq in 2003. War-mongering and wars of Empire never bothered her then or now. Just a few weeks ago, she was photographed giving the recidivist war criminal, Republican Henry Kissinger, a big, smiling hug at a public event. It’s all part of the bi-partisan image she is cultivating under the opportunistic banner of “cooperation.” (For more information, read the New York Times’ Collateral Damage and Nixon and Kissinger’s Forgotten Shame, or Seymour Hersh’s The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House.)

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/09-3


If the Democratic party is willing let the rich and powerful manipulate public opinion to drive out potential contenders and more progressive candidates this far out from the primaries, then we're toast.

Fuck that. It's an abuse of the system.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nader should have run for Senator years ago Skink Nov 2013 #1
I am reminded of 2007-2008 and the "inevitability" of Hillary. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author BootinUp Nov 2013 #2
I am the first person to hate Nader DonCoquixote Nov 2013 #3
Ralph Nader was a really good product safety advocate.... Walk away Nov 2013 #4
I'd say Gore handed the presidency to the Republicans, Maedhros Nov 2013 #18
I don't see how ANY true progressive can win pangaia Nov 2013 #6
If she wanted to try, I think Liz Warren could have a good shot at winning the primary. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #7
Liz is one person I would definitely go out and work for. pangaia Nov 2013 #11
Please, no more Clintons and no more Bushes. (n/t) spin Nov 2013 #8
here here. she is a corporatist, was hawk and she will bring all the bill people in. roguevalley Nov 2013 #9
I just firmly believe that we do not need any political dynasties in our nation, period! spin Nov 2013 #10
Now I like her. I'm sick of Nadir opening his BlueToTheBone Nov 2013 #12
Nader haters gonna' hate. [n/t] Maedhros Nov 2013 #19
Kick, thanks. Scuba Nov 2013 #13
I see the irony of a corporate sponsored Ms. Clinton getting the best of Citizens United ruling. rhett o rick Nov 2013 #14
Hillary is a solid investment for TPTB. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #15
So do you get the irony? Citizens United was about corp-money to be used to torpedo her rhett o rick Nov 2013 #16
This! KoKo Nov 2013 #17
Bizzare bedfellows. I'd love to be a miniature drone for a week. nt adirondacker Nov 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»"The Dynastic Hillar...»Reply #0