Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
9. Whenever someone mentions anyone who is Not Hillary, we get told patronizingly that
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 06:47 PM
Dec 2013

oh, it is too early - although we are also regaled with Emily's List and other endorsements. Not too early for Hillary, evidently.
Warren, although a couple of years younger than Hillary, is also deemed too old.
Concentrate on 2014 - but oh yeah, Hillary already has people and money in place. A primary challenger should start soon! By now! But don't think about it until after 2014.

It is disheartening - we are to vote for the jersey with a D, even if the D stands for DINO, in the increasingly ridiculous hope that we will stop greasily sliding to the right.

Yes, name recognition is there for Hillary - but that does not mean the recognition is admiration. The GOP hatesss her, although hard sometimes to see why. She is divisive at this point, I feel. And electing anyone based on private parts is just making a mockery of the process. IMO as a woman who worked during the uber-sexist 60's and 70's and 80's.

Also want to mention that I believe most endorsements of politicians by other politicians is meaningless, because likely they know damn right well who they had better endorse. I don't care if Warren endorses Hillary, that does not mean I would vote for Hillary in a primary.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»So much to the apparent l...»Reply #9