Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
7. I think you are right. And also, they have more of a platform now than back in the early Bush
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:22 AM
Jan 2014

years. Nearly everyone has access to the internet for one thing, and the younger people now get most of their information online. Whistle Blowers no longer have to depend on the Corporate Media to get their information out. We have easy access to news media from all over the world now.

It would be the right thing to do for the WH to accept their offer. Better yet would be for Congress to meet with them and to hold public hearings.

But while I wish that would happen, I do not believe there is a chance that it will. We were told to move forward from war crimes, from lies about war etc. so it probably won't happen. However, if there was no internet, we would not even know about this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»Former NSA Whistleblowers...»Reply #7