Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xocet

(3,992 posts)
4. That was not my point. It seemed odd to me to choose one's being barefoot as an indicator of
Tue May 27, 2014, 12:07 PM
May 2014

intelligence, background, etc.

What all fits in the "constellation" of traits that define the stereotype of "hillbilly"? What are the so-called characteristics of a "redneck"? Do the two sets overlap? Are these traits seen to be quite acceptable in other groups - i.e., being barefoot in Hawaii, etc - but have negative connotations in relation to the region and/or group discussed in the article to which you linked?

If you want to invalidate a stereotype, why not define it and simply show that all the traits that make up its definition are accepted in the context of other groups? If these traits are acceptable in the case of the other groups, then why are they also not acceptable in the case of the groups that are ostensibly being unfairly labeled and demeaned?

Would that not illustrate that the labeling of said group is merely a latent form of prejudice, and thus would that not provide an answer to your OP's opening question?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Appalachia»Are "Hillbilly"...»Reply #4