General Discussion

TomSlick

(11,970 posts)

60. Not so.

Wed Dec 11, 2024, 10:06 PM

4 hrs ago

I have not criticized DU rules or their enforcement. I have not attempted to limit discussion or criticism of Democrats. I have only asked that we all refrain from personally insulting Democratic public figures.

Nevertheless, if you think I have violated a TOS, you should alert on my post and let a jury decide.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I need to get this off my chest. [View all] TomSlick 5 hrs ago OP

I served on a jury today which put a post trashing Fetterman on trial. Frasier Balzov 5 hrs ago #1

How you decide an alert on jury duty is a matter for your conscience. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #5

Per Forum Rules - "Don't post messages about site rules, enforcement, juries..." DontBelieveEastisEas 4 hrs ago #50

I did not post about how DU is run. Or at least no more than you. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #63

I think it's me who is being admonished here? Frasier Balzov 4 hrs ago #66

I'm sorry. I do not find it a big thing, one way or the other, I just found the OP fascinating in the way DontBelieveEastisEas 3 hrs ago #74

I'll take my knocks if I deserve them. Frasier Balzov 3 hrs ago #78

Seems disingenuous as you lean heavily on TOS in OP and responses. Ilikepurple 3 hrs ago #72

My skin is thick enough. There is nothing anyone can call me that I haven't been called before. TomSlick 3 hrs ago #75

Depends on what it said, exactly--- it isn't against the rules to disagree with our leaders, Jack Valentino 3 hrs ago #69

It was a general renunciation of him as a lost soul. Frasier Balzov 3 hrs ago #73

Sounds like a "border-line" post... Jack Valentino 3 hrs ago #79

Yes. rules are rules and we are guests. Groundhawg 3 hrs ago #71

Agreed. anciano 5 hrs ago #2

I disagree BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #3

THIS!!!! n/t Just_Vote_Dem 5 hrs ago #4

And who defines what or who "represents the party?" He has a right to his opinions question everything 5 hrs ago #6

And BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #12

Nevertheless, bashing Democrats violates the Terms of Service. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #7

Feel free to alert and the jury will make its decision Just_Vote_Dem 5 hrs ago #10

You can't alert on a string of responses at the same time. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #13

I will BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #11

Nevertheless, those are the Terms of Service. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #17

OK BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #19

I do not find a Term of Service that would be violated for reporting what a politician said. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #28

Post removed Post removed 5 hrs ago #30

+1 SPOT ON! Emile 5 hrs ago #32

THANK YOU!!!!! n/t Just_Vote_Dem 5 hrs ago #35

THANK YOU!!! niyad 4 hrs ago #58

Not so. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #60

+1 leftstreet 4 hrs ago #62

This message was self-deleted by its author DontBelieveEastisEas 4 hrs ago #53

Please see my reply to your earlier similar post. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #64

Pointing out that a politicians is supporting something the traitorous republicans are doing is not Autumn 5 hrs ago #8

I have no problem with posts disagreeing with Democrats. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #9

I have BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #23

Does the gloves coming off help with typing or something? Sympthsical 4 hrs ago #43

I can do 25 on a good day Just_Vote_Dem 4 hrs ago #44

Probably a blessing Sympthsical 4 hrs ago #47

90WPM BeerBarrelPolka 4 hrs ago #45

I think I have dyslexia of the fingers. lol, so I put your statement to the test. My fingers seem DontBelieveEastisEas 3 hrs ago #83

I BeerBarrelPolka 3 hrs ago #84

OMG, I don't know how you get by. rotfl DontBelieveEastisEas 3 hrs ago #85

Who defines "vulgar"??? niyad 4 hrs ago #57

Part of my definition for vulgar is language I would not use concerning my friends. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #65

Absolutely. Just_Vote_Dem 5 hrs ago #16

Fetterman marches to a different drummer and I appreciate surfered 5 hrs ago #14

My point exactly. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #21

In general I agree but we are in extraordinary times Meowmee 5 hrs ago #15

We are free to criticize who we will. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #22

How about Manchin and Sinema? HereForTheParty 5 hrs ago #18

I not offended by posts criticizing anyone. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #24

Do you think we would be better off with Joe Manchin or Jim Justice in the senate. bottomofthehill 4 hrs ago #42

Thank you Tom canetoad 5 hrs ago #20

From many of the replies above, your initial inclination may have been correct. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #25

I feel like this is an issue for DU juries Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #26

You cannot alert on multiple replies in a post. TomSlick 5 hrs ago #34

you are again in violation DU TOS, this time via you directly targeting DU posters Celerity 4 hrs ago #39

It was alerted n/t Just_Vote_Dem 4 hrs ago #40

well, those DUers now have targets painted on their backs, unfortunately Celerity 4 hrs ago #56

I'm the author of the first post you linked. Quiet Em 3 hrs ago #81

The no bashing Democrats ambiguous to me. LakeArenal 5 hrs ago #27

Absolutely BeerBarrelPolka 5 hrs ago #33

For some any and all criticism is Bashing SunImp 4 hrs ago #51

The alert system doesn't always do what we want wryter2000 5 hrs ago #29

I have resisted using the ignore function for years now. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #36

Pretending that rightwing ideology is correct... Think. Again. 5 hrs ago #31

We are not asked to ignore what Democrats say. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #38

I don't know what's up with him. Joining truth social, asking for charges to be dropped on the criminal. brush 4 hrs ago #37

Who says Fetterman has not gone to Truth Social applegrove 4 hrs ago #41

Come on m8, Fetterman said the NY trial and conviction of Trump was a politically motivated attack. He is undermining Celerity 4 hrs ago #46

Some Democrats think the hush money trial was not neccessary. applegrove 4 hrs ago #48

when the US sneezes, the rest of the world often catches a cold Celerity 4 hrs ago #52

Yes. The risk is real for the world. applegrove 4 hrs ago #55

While I don't agree with Rep. Clyburn, Clyburn was talking about the federal charges for which Quiet Em 4 hrs ago #61

Does T need a pardon with presidential immunity? Hope22 3 hrs ago #80

This message was self-deleted by its author DontBelieveEastisEas 4 hrs ago #49

I'm guessing the forum policies are better equipped to deal with this issue. Ilikepurple 4 hrs ago #54

Most forums give people a bit of breathing room when bad news hits. Irish_Dem 4 hrs ago #59

Guilty as charged. TomSlick 4 hrs ago #68

But you cannot always strong arm and control the majority of people on a forum. Irish_Dem 3 hrs ago #76

I accept your admonition. TomSlick 3 hrs ago #77

Meta !!! Iggo 4 hrs ago #67

Fetterman is a huge disappointment especially recently ALBliberal 3 hrs ago #70

All I'll say is there is a very clear battle line and folks damn well better figure out which side they're on... Blue_Tires 3 hrs ago #82