Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,544 posts)
37. MaddowBlog-Despite the Constitution, Trump says he's 'not joking' about eyeing a third term
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 11:53 AM
Mar 2025

The 22nd Amendment says, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” The incumbent president doesn't fully accept that.

If you're just catching up on news from the weekend, Trump said he's "not joking" about possibly trying to pursue a third term.

The Constitution says, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." Trump apparently doesn't accept that. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-03-31T11:58:35.374Z

If you're just catching up on news from the weekend, Trump said he's "not joking" about possibly trying to pursue a third term.

The Constitution says, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." Trump apparently doesn't accept that.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/constitution-trump-says-s-not-joking-eyeing-third-term-rcna198827

This strategy came to mind anew upon hearing the Republican talk about possibly pursuing a third term in the White House. NBC News reported:

President Donald Trump did not rule out the possibility of seeking a third term in the White House, which is prohibited by the Constitution under the 22nd Amendment, saying in an exclusive interview with NBC News that there were methods for doing so and clarifying that he was “not joking.” ... “A lot of people want me to do it,” Trump said in a Sunday-morning phone call with NBC News, referring to his allies.


.....In fact, in his interview with NBC News, Trump was hardly subtle. “I’m not joking,” he said, adding that there are “methods” in which he could pursue such a goal.

NBC News asked about a possible scenario in which Vice President JD Vance would run for office and then pass the role to Trump. Trump responded that “that’s one” method. “But there are others, too,” Trump added. Asked to share another method, Trump simply responded “no.”


Hours after the NBC News report reached the public, the president chatted with reporters aboard Air Force One and dodged a series of questions on the topic, though he claimed that “people” have asked him to run for a third term — which he said would be a fourth term “in a way” because his 2020 race was “totally rigged.” (It was not rigged; he lost fair and square, and he’s been lying uncontrollably about this for more than four years.).....

I won’t pretend to know where this is headed or the degree to which the president is prepared to defy constitutional law. But Scott Cummings, a professor of legal ethics at the UCLA School of Law, made a comment on "The Rachel Maddow Show" on Friday that stood out for me.

Commenting on autocracies around the world that have consolidated power, Cummings noted that in none of these countries “do leaders do all the things that Trump is doing, take aim at all of these independent institutions, and then just walk away.” Rather, the professor added, authoritarians take these steps because they intend “to stay in power permanently.”

trump needs to stay in power and will try to stay in power anyway that he can

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dictators don't follow any laws gab13by13 Mar 2025 #1
Do not give this foolish idea any oxygen. Why even state it? travelingthrulife Mar 2025 #2
Because I think (from what we've seen of their behaviour so far) that it is a greater than 50% chance they'll try it. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #6
A near certainty he will try, if he is still alive. He has never intended to leave. GoodRaisin Mar 2025 #31
Yep, it would be a big mistake to think he won't try. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #33
Bannon has already discussed it OnDoutside Mar 2025 #8
Exactly Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #10
That's our version of "Don't look up!" Burying our heads is HOW WE GOT HERE. Maru Kitteh Mar 2025 #28
A constitutional amendment would be necessary Beausoleil Mar 2025 #3
Biden in 2020, the courts have stopped a lot of what he wants EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #18
If he lives that long, and a Constitutional amendment changing the 22nd. Ocelot II Mar 2025 #4
Or, if someone brought it before the SC to "test" the constitutionality, what are the odds that a Trump court would OnDoutside Mar 2025 #11
A constitutional amendment can't be unconstitutional, by definition. Ocelot II Mar 2025 #15
The Constitution is always constitutional... JCMach1 Mar 2025 #17
Technically, a constitutional amendment. Torchlight Mar 2025 #5
I think legally it would be a huge challenge, a constitutional change. defacto7 Mar 2025 #7
In practice, he can get away with it the same way he can be president after starting an insurrection unblock Mar 2025 #9
Yes, that's the type of thing I am expecting. Which makes the midterms so so important. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #13
If that's the case Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #12
You might be onto something there ! OnDoutside Mar 2025 #14
Many rules apply to democrats that don't seem to apply to republicans.... unblock Mar 2025 #19
I've unfortunately noticed... Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #21
I have a feeling he will not be physically able too.nt Tribetime Mar 2025 #16
The technofascists will have no need for a front man by 2028 JCMach1 Mar 2025 #20
They could prop up his dead carcass a la "Weekend At Bernie's" and they'd still vote for him. Wednesdays Mar 2025 #22
22nd Amendment, Section 1 reads... ProudMNDemocrat Mar 2025 #23
It can't be done without another constitutional amendment to repeal it. valleyrogue Mar 2025 #24
Regardless of who has an interest in this, looking at him, it'll be most likely the Grim Reaper. marble falls Mar 2025 #25
Under current law, I'd expect many blue states to not allow him on the ballot. RobertDevereaux Mar 2025 #26
Great point OnDoutside Mar 2025 #27
38 states ratifying a constitutional amendment, but then Obama can run again too krawhitham Mar 2025 #29
Authoritarian option #1: Ignore the constitution and cow the justice system into submission. Eugene Mar 2025 #30
And they could declare a war on the Houthis and declare himself a wartime president like Zelenskyy. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #35
I'm surprised he's not running already Diraven Mar 2025 #32
Yes, this is the most obvious way....up is down and down is up. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #34
Tamping down the third term hype for Trump LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #36
MaddowBlog-Despite the Constitution, Trump says he's 'not joking' about eyeing a third term LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #37
I also doubt that trump will be around for a third term LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #38
Only the good die young, so that bstard will be around forever. OnDoutside Apr 2025 #39
I assume he would run, possibly win, his VP would eventually become president Johonny Apr 2025 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What exactly would need t...»Reply #37