Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftishBrit

(41,307 posts)
9. What really bothers me is: why reduce the number of MPs at all at this stage?
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 10:19 AM
Sep 2016

600 is a lower number than we've had at any time in the last 200 years. This could be partially explained in terms of earlier parliaments including MPs for all of Ireland; but it is also lower than in any post-Partition parliament. Meanwhile, the population has increased; MPs' constituency duties have increased, and are, I believe, higher than the equivalent in most other countries; and MPs will have their work cut out for them - whether or not they actually choose to do it! - with all this Brexit mess. If they want to save money, then they could freeze MPs' salaries, reduce allowable expenses, and not increase the size of the House of Lords.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»England & Wales Constitue...»Reply #9