Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
1. I think it was "two roes," something the KJV doesn't explain well
Fri Mar 24, 2023, 12:17 AM
Mar 2023

since the modern usage is either a fish ovary stuffed full of eggs or an investment scheme. Either seems like an odd comparison, as bad as "fawns." I mean, were they all spotty? Absolutely motionless? What?

One person came up with a really obscure reference of the time of the KJV that said it might have been baby bunnies, which makes a bit more sense.

Atheists seem to be the only ones who have read that bit. Too many Christians seem to be more obsessed with the bits that tell them who they can hate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Parent Calls Bible 'PORN'...»Reply #1