Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Oh God. It's real. He's holding a rally just like those damned speeches. [View all]csziggy
(34,189 posts)45. No - Andrew Jackson - The Atlantic has an excellent comparison of the two
Donald Trump and the Legacy of Andrew Jackson
Theres no shortage of parallels between the two populistsbut theres at least one crucial difference.
Steve Inskeep Nov 30, 2016
Steve Bannon, the media executive and soon-to-be White House strategist, has been describing Donald Trumps victory as just the beginning. Like [Andrew] Jacksons populism, he told the Hollywood Reporter, were going to build an entirely new political movement.
Newt Gingrich has compared Trump to Jackson for some time. Rudolph Giuliani declared on election night that it was like Andrew Jacksons victory. This is the people beating the establishment. That may seem a comforting comparison, since it locates Donald Trump in the American experience and makes his election seem less of a departure.
Is Trumps victory really like Jacksons? On the surface, yes: In 1828, an outsider candidate appealed directly to the people against elites he called corrupt. A deeper look at Jacksons victory complicates the comparison, but still says much about America then and now.
<SNIP>
When Bannon spoke of founding a new political movement, though, he was referring to the period immediately afterward. Jackson and his allies created a new organization, the Democratic Party. His opponents were forced to up their own political game by founding a new opposition party, and American politics began growing into the two-party rivalry that we know today. The old, staid political order cracked up.
More: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trump-and-andrew-jackson/508973/
Theres no shortage of parallels between the two populistsbut theres at least one crucial difference.
Steve Inskeep Nov 30, 2016
Steve Bannon, the media executive and soon-to-be White House strategist, has been describing Donald Trumps victory as just the beginning. Like [Andrew] Jacksons populism, he told the Hollywood Reporter, were going to build an entirely new political movement.
Newt Gingrich has compared Trump to Jackson for some time. Rudolph Giuliani declared on election night that it was like Andrew Jacksons victory. This is the people beating the establishment. That may seem a comforting comparison, since it locates Donald Trump in the American experience and makes his election seem less of a departure.
Is Trumps victory really like Jacksons? On the surface, yes: In 1828, an outsider candidate appealed directly to the people against elites he called corrupt. A deeper look at Jacksons victory complicates the comparison, but still says much about America then and now.
<SNIP>
When Bannon spoke of founding a new political movement, though, he was referring to the period immediately afterward. Jackson and his allies created a new organization, the Democratic Party. His opponents were forced to up their own political game by founding a new opposition party, and American politics began growing into the two-party rivalry that we know today. The old, staid political order cracked up.
More: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/trump-and-andrew-jackson/508973/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh God. It's real. He's holding a rally just like those damned speeches. [View all]
nolabear
Dec 2016
OP
He is addicted to the adulation. He can't survive without constant feeding of his ego. Bigly feedi
SharonAnn
Dec 2016
#26
How many of the M$M will wall to wall this gloating?! How many of those cowardly punk ass's allow
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#21
... cause they're about as classless as he fuckin is... this man is a disgrace, gloating isn't going
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#25
Isn't there any law that says a clinically insane sociopath cannot be president?
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#29
Oh I expect all the cable news stations are. Of course they're all dishonest, right?
nolabear
Dec 2016
#42